An adult client who has been experiencing a seizure for approximately 15 minutes is brought to the emergency department by private vehicle. Which intervention should the nurse implement first?

Choice A reason: The first priority in this situation is to ensure the client’s airway is secure. Difficulty breathing and stridor indicate a potential airway obstruction, which can be life-threatening. Activating the hospital’s emergency or rapid response system ensures that the client receives immediate medical attention from a team equipped to handle such emergencies. This step is crucial to prevent respiratory arrest and other complications.

Choice B reason: While placing a heart monitor on the client and observing for dysrhythmias is important, it is not the immediate priority in this scenario. The client’s airway and breathing take precedence over monitoring heart rhythms. Once the airway is secured and breathing is stabilized, then monitoring for dysrhythmias can be considered.

Choice C reason: Asking the charge nurse to come see the client immediately is a reasonable action, but it is not the most effective first step. The charge nurse may not have the necessary equipment or expertise to handle an acute airway obstruction. Activating the emergency or rapid response system ensures that a specialized team responds quickly.

Choice D reason: Checking the client’s blood pressure and heart rate is important for overall assessment, but it is not the immediate priority when there is a potential airway obstruction. Ensuring the client can breathe is the most critical action. Vital signs can be checked once the airway is secured.

Choice E reason: Providing a calm and assuring environment for the client is beneficial for reducing anxiety, but it does not address the immediate threat to the client’s airway. While maintaining a calm environment is important, the nurse must first ensure the client’s airway is open and breathing is adequate.

Choice F reason: Placing the emergency cart at the bedside is a preparatory step that can be useful, but it is not the first action to take. The nurse should first activate the emergency or rapid response system to get immediate help. The emergency cart can be brought to the bedside by the responding team.

Choice A Reason:

Documenting that the nasogastric tube is in the correct place is not appropriate in this scenario. A gastric pH of 7.35 is too high for stomach contents, which typically have a pH between 1.5 and 3.5. This high pH suggests that the tube may be misplaced, possibly in the respiratory tract or another non-gastric location. Therefore, documenting the tube as correctly placed could lead to serious complications if the tube is indeed misplaced.

Choice B Reason:

Notifying the health care provider is the most appropriate action. A pH of 7.35 is indicative of a potential misplacement of the nasogastric tube. The health care provider needs to be informed immediately to take corrective actions, such as ordering an X-ray to confirm the tube’s placement or re-evaluating the tube’s position. This step is crucial to ensure patient safety and prevent complications such as aspiration pneumonia or other adverse effects.

Choice C Reason:

Checking for placement by auscultating for air injected into the tube is an outdated and unreliable method. This technique can sometimes give false assurance of correct placement, as the sound of air can be heard even if the tube is in the respiratory tract. Current best practices recommend using pH testing and radiographic confirmation for accurate placement verification.

Choice D Reason:

Retesting the pH using another strip might seem like a reasonable step, but it is not the best immediate action. If the initial pH test shows a value of 7.35, it is unlikely that retesting will yield a significantly different result. The priority should be to notify the health care provider to address the potential misplacement promptly.

.