A client experiences impaired swallowing after a stroke and has worked with speech-language pathology on eating. What nursing assessment best indicates that the expected outcome for this problem has been met?
Gains 2 lbs (1 kg) after 1 week.
Chooses preferred items from the menu.
Clearly understands and articulates.
Eats 75 to 100% of all meals and snacks.
The Correct Answer is J
Choice A Reason:
Gaining weight can be an indicator of improved nutrition, but it does not directly address the client’s ability to swallow safely and effectively. Weight gain could be due to other factors such as fluid retention or changes in metabolism. Therefore, while it is a positive outcome, it is not the best indicator of improved swallowing function.
Choice B Reason:
Choosing preferred items from the menu indicates that the client is engaged in their meal planning and has an appetite. However, it does not directly measure the client’s ability to swallow safely. The client might still have difficulty swallowing even if they are choosing their preferred foods.
Choice C Reason:
Clear understanding and articulation are important for communication and can indicate cognitive improvement. However, this choice does not directly relate to the client’s swallowing ability. The primary concern in this scenario is the client’s ability to swallow safely, not their communication skills.
Choice D Reason:
Eating 75 to 100% of all meals and snacks is the best indicator that the client has improved their swallowing ability. This choice directly measures the client’s ability to consume food and liquids safely and effectively. It shows that the client can manage their meals without significant difficulty, which is the primary goal of the intervention.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A Reason:
Documenting that the nasogastric tube is in the correct place is not appropriate in this scenario. A gastric pH of 7.35 is too high for stomach contents, which typically have a pH between 1.5 and 3.5. This high pH suggests that the tube may be misplaced, possibly in the respiratory tract or another non-gastric location. Therefore, documenting the tube as correctly placed could lead to serious complications if the tube is indeed misplaced.
Choice B Reason:
Notifying the health care provider is the most appropriate action. A pH of 7.35 is indicative of a potential misplacement of the nasogastric tube. The health care provider needs to be informed immediately to take corrective actions, such as ordering an X-ray to confirm the tube’s placement or re-evaluating the tube’s position. This step is crucial to ensure patient safety and prevent complications such as aspiration pneumonia or other adverse effects.
Choice C Reason:
Checking for placement by auscultating for air injected into the tube is an outdated and unreliable method. This technique can sometimes give false assurance of correct placement, as the sound of air can be heard even if the tube is in the respiratory tract. Current best practices recommend using pH testing and radiographic confirmation for accurate placement verification.
Choice D Reason:
Retesting the pH using another strip might seem like a reasonable step, but it is not the best immediate action. If the initial pH test shows a value of 7.35, it is unlikely that retesting will yield a significantly different result. The priority should be to notify the health care provider to address the potential misplacement promptly.
.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A Reason:
Increased serum amylase is a key indicator of acute pancreatitis. Amylase is an enzyme produced by the pancreas to help digest carbohydrates. In cases of acute pancreatitis, the pancreas becomes inflamed, leading to the release of amylase into the bloodstream. Elevated levels of serum amylase, typically more than three times the upper limit of normal, are a strong indication of acute pancreatitis. This enzyme level usually rises within a few hours of the onset of pancreatitis and can remain elevated for several days.
Choice B Reason:
Increased serum calcium is not typically associated with acute pancreatitis. In fact, acute pancreatitis can often lead to hypocalcemia (low calcium levels) due to fat saponification in the pancreas, where calcium binds with fatty acids. Therefore, an increase in serum calcium would not be expected in a patient with acute pancreatitis. Monitoring calcium levels is important, but an increase is not a diagnostic marker for this condition.
Choice C Reason:
Decreased WBC (white blood cell count) is not a characteristic finding in acute pancreatitis. On the contrary, acute pancreatitis often leads to an elevated WBC count due to the inflammatory response in the body. Leukocytosis (increased WBC) is a common finding in many inflammatory and infectious conditions, including acute pancreatitis. Therefore, a decreased WBC count would not be expected and does not support the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.
Choice D Reason:
Decreased serum lipase is incorrect. Similar to amylase, lipase is another enzyme produced by the pancreas, which helps in the digestion of fats. In acute pancreatitis, serum lipase levels also increase significantly, often more than three times the upper limit of normal. Lipase levels tend to rise slightly later than amylase but remain elevated for a longer period, making it a useful marker for diagnosing acute pancreatitis. Therefore, decreased serum lipase would not be expected in this condition.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today