After teaching a nursing student about mitral valve stenosis and mitral valve regurgitation, the nurse identifies effective learning when the student identifies which common feature of both disorders?
Hemoptysis
High-pitched holosystolic murmur
Hepatomegaly
The Correct Answer is A
Choice A Reason:
Hemoptysis, or coughing up blood, is a common feature of both mitral valve stenosis and mitral valve regurgitation. In mitral valve stenosis, the narrowing of the valve leads to increased pressure in the pulmonary veins, which can cause pulmonary congestion and hemoptysis. Similarly, in mitral valve regurgitation, the backflow of blood into the left atrium increases pulmonary pressure, potentially leading to pulmonary edema and hemoptysis. Therefore, hemoptysis is a shared symptom of both conditions.
Choice B Reason:
A high-pitched holosystolic murmur is more commonly associated with mitral valve regurgitation rather than mitral valve stenosis. In mitral valve regurgitation, the murmur is caused by the backflow of blood from the left ventricle into the left atrium during systole3. Mitral valve stenosis, on the other hand, typically presents with a diastolic murmur due to the turbulent flow of blood through the narrowed valve during diastole. Therefore, a high-pitched holosystolic murmur is not a common feature of both disorders.
Choice C Reason:
Hepatomegaly, or an enlarged liver, can occur in advanced cases of both mitral valve stenosis and mitral valve regurgitation due to right-sided heart failure. However, it is not a primary or common feature of these conditions. Hepatomegaly is more often associated with conditions that directly affect the right side of the heart or cause systemic congestion. Therefore, hepatomegaly is not a common feature of both mitral valve stenosis and mitral valve regurgitation.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A Reason:
Documenting that the nasogastric tube is in the correct place is not appropriate in this scenario. A gastric pH of 7.35 is too high for stomach contents, which typically have a pH between 1.5 and 3.5. This high pH suggests that the tube may be misplaced, possibly in the respiratory tract or another non-gastric location. Therefore, documenting the tube as correctly placed could lead to serious complications if the tube is indeed misplaced.
Choice B Reason:
Notifying the health care provider is the most appropriate action. A pH of 7.35 is indicative of a potential misplacement of the nasogastric tube. The health care provider needs to be informed immediately to take corrective actions, such as ordering an X-ray to confirm the tube’s placement or re-evaluating the tube’s position. This step is crucial to ensure patient safety and prevent complications such as aspiration pneumonia or other adverse effects.
Choice C Reason:
Checking for placement by auscultating for air injected into the tube is an outdated and unreliable method. This technique can sometimes give false assurance of correct placement, as the sound of air can be heard even if the tube is in the respiratory tract. Current best practices recommend using pH testing and radiographic confirmation for accurate placement verification.
Choice D Reason:
Retesting the pH using another strip might seem like a reasonable step, but it is not the best immediate action. If the initial pH test shows a value of 7.35, it is unlikely that retesting will yield a significantly different result. The priority should be to notify the health care provider to address the potential misplacement promptly.
.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A Reason:
Documenting that the nasogastric tube is in the correct place is not appropriate in this scenario. The normal pH range for gastric contents is typically between 1.5 and 3.5. A pH of 7.35 is much higher than this range, indicating that the tube may not be in the stomach. Therefore, documenting the tube as correctly placed could lead to potential complications, such as improper feeding or medication administration.
Choice B Reason:
Notifying the health care provider is the correct action. A pH of 7.35 suggests that the nasogastric tube may be misplaced, possibly in the respiratory tract or another non-gastric location. Immediate notification of the health care provider is crucial to prevent any adverse outcomes and to take corrective measures, such as confirming placement with an X-ray or re-inserting the tube.
Choice C Reason:
Checking for placement by auscultating for air injected into the tube is not a reliable method for verifying nasogastric tube placement. While this method was traditionally used, it has been found to be inaccurate and is no longer recommended. The sound of air entering the stomach can be misleading and does not confirm correct placement.
Choice D Reason:
Retesting the pH using another strip is not the best immediate action. While it is important to ensure the accuracy of the pH reading, a pH of 7.35 is significantly outside the normal gastric range, and retesting is unlikely to yield a different result. The priority should be to notify the health care provider to address the potential misplacement of the tube.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
