A public health nurse is comparing mortality rates in their state to overall mortality rates in the U.S. Which of the following mortality rates should the nurse use for this comparison?
Proportionate mortality
Case fatality
Cause-specific mortality rate
Crude mortality rate
The Correct Answer is D
Choice A Reason:
Proportionate mortality refers to the proportion of deaths in a population attributable to different causes. It is expressed as a percentage of total deaths. While useful for understanding the distribution of causes of death, it does not provide a direct comparison of overall mortality rates between different populations or regions.
Choice B Reason:
Case fatality rate is the proportion of individuals diagnosed with a particular disease who die from that disease within a specified period. It is a measure of the severity of the disease rather than the overall mortality rate. This metric is not suitable for comparing general mortality rates between a state and the entire country.
Choice C Reason:
Cause-specific mortality rate refers to the mortality rate from a specific cause of death within a population. While this can provide insights into the impact of particular diseases or conditions, it does not offer a comprehensive view of overall mortality. Comparing cause-specific mortality rates would require multiple comparisons for different causes, complicating the analysis.
Choice D Reason:
Crude mortality rate is the total number of deaths in a population over a specific period, usually expressed per 1,000 or 100,000 individuals. This rate provides a straightforward measure of the overall mortality in a population, making it the most appropriate metric for comparing mortality rates between a state and the entire country. It allows for a direct comparison of the general health status and mortality burden across different regions.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A Reason:
My community is struggling with high morbidity due to heart health, so this initiative has merit. This statement indicates a clear understanding of the Million Hearts initiative, which aims to prevent heart attacks and strokes by improving cardiovascular health. Recognizing the high morbidity due to heart health issues in the community aligns with the initiative's goals, making it a suitable and beneficial program to implement.
Choice B Reason:
These initiative strategies are still in the experimental stage and have questionable merit in practice. This statement is incorrect because the Million Hearts initiative is a well-established program with proven strategies to reduce cardiovascular disease. It is not in the experimental stage and has demonstrated effectiveness in various communities.
Choice C Reason:
It is a local initiative and should not be used outside my state. This statement is incorrect as the Million Hearts initiative is a national program in the United States, designed to be implemented across different states and communities. It is not restricted to any specific locality and can be adapted to meet the needs of various populations.
Choice D Reason:
I will need to get a doctor's order or directive from the community health lead before considering outside initiatives. While collaboration with healthcare providers and community leaders is important, this statement does not reflect an understanding of the initiative itself. The Million Hearts initiative can be implemented by various stakeholders, including nurses, without requiring a specific directive from a doctor or community health lead.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A: Health Care Illiteracy
Health care illiteracy refers to a lack of understanding about health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions. While this is an important issue, it is not the immediate priority in this scenario. The client's report of skipping meals indicates an urgent need for addressing food insecurity, which directly impacts their health and well-being.
Choice B: Food Access
This is the correct choice. Food access is a critical issue because it directly affects the client's nutritional status and overall health. Skipping meals due to financial constraints can lead to malnutrition, weakened immune function, and delayed recovery from cellulitis. Ensuring the client has access to adequate and nutritious food is essential for their immediate health needs and recovery.
Choice C: Economic Stability
Economic stability is important for long-term health and well-being, but it is not the most immediate concern in this scenario. Addressing food access will have a more direct and immediate impact on the client's health. Once the client's nutritional needs are met, the nurse can then work on connecting the client with resources to improve their economic stability.
Choice D: Quality of Education
Quality of education is a significant factor in overall health and socioeconomic status, but it is not the immediate priority in this case. The client's immediate health needs, particularly their access to food, should be addressed first. Education can be part of a longer-term plan to improve the client's economic stability and health literacy.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
