Choice A rationale:
It is crucial to prioritize the patient's spouse's emotional needs and preferences during this highly stressful and sensitive situation. Offering the choice to be present during resuscitation demonstrates respect for their autonomy, promotes family- centered care, and facilitates coping mechanisms.
Key considerations supporting this approach:
Respect for Autonomy:
Patients and their loved ones have the right to make informed decisions about their care, including being present during resuscitation efforts.
Respecting this right fosters trust, empowers the spouse, and aligns with ethical principles of patient autonomy. Family-Centered Care:
Family-centered care recognizes the importance of family members in the patient's care and decision-making.
Inviting the spouse to be present demonstrates a commitment to including them in the care process and supporting their emotional needs.
Facilitating Coping Mechanisms:
Witnessing resuscitation efforts can be distressing, but it can also provide closure, acceptance, and the opportunity to say goodbye.
Some individuals find comfort in being present and actively involved, even in difficult circumstances. The nurse can provide emotional support and guidance throughout the process.
Potential Benefits of Presence:
Studies have shown that family presence during resuscitation can have positive outcomes, such as decreased anxiety and post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in family members.
It may also contribute to greater satisfaction with care and a sense of peace for those who choose to be present.
Rationales for other choices:
Choice B: Requesting that the spouse sit in the waiting room may isolate them and increase their anxiety. It deprives them of the opportunity to be involved in decision-making and potentially delays their grieving process.
Choice C: While the hospital's crisis team can provide valuable support, immediate referral may not align with the spouse's immediate needs or preferences. It's essential to first assess their emotional state and offer the choice of being present.
Choice D: Suggesting prayer may be appropriate for some individuals, but it should not be the first or only option presented. It's important to respect the spouse's spiritual beliefs and offer a range of support options.

Choice A rationale:
Administering an antipyretic would lower the client's fever, but it would not address the underlying cause of the sepsis. Antipyretics can mask important signs and symptoms of infection, making it more difficult to diagnose and treat the sepsis. It's important to identify the causative organism of sepsis to initiate appropriate antibiotic therapy.
Therefore, obtaining cultures to identify the causative organism is the priority action.
Choice B rationale:
Obtaining specified cultures is the most important action for a client with possible sepsis because it allows for the identification of the causative organism.
This information is essential for selecting the appropriate antibiotic therapy. Cultures should be obtained as soon as possible, before antibiotics are administered.
Choice C rationale:
While administering antibiotics is an important part of the treatment for sepsis, it is not the first action that the nurse should take.
Antibiotics should be administered after the causative organism has been identified.
Administering antibiotics before cultures are obtained can make it more difficult to identify the causative organism.
Choice D rationale:
Placing the client in isolation is important to prevent the spread of infection, but it is not the first action that the nurse should take.
The priority is to identify the causative organism and initiate appropriate treatment. The client can be placed in isolation after cultures have been obtained.