A patient with HIV-1 is curious as to why gabapentin is included in their medication regimen, despite not having a history of seizures. What would be the most appropriate response from the nurse?

Choice A rationale:
Uncompensated Respiratory Acidosis is characterized by a low pH (less than 7.35) and a high pCO2 (greater than 45 mmHg). In this case, the pH is slightly elevated (7.46), making this option less likely.
While the pCO2 is elevated (46 mmHg), the body has begun to compensate, as evidenced by the elevated HCO3 (29 mEq/L). This partial compensation does not align with an uncompensated respiratory acidosis.
Choice B rationale:
Compensated Metabolic Acidosis would present with a normal pH (7.35-7.45) due to full compensation by the respiratory system. In this case, the pH is slightly elevated (7.46), which is not consistent with full compensation.
Additionally, the HCO3 is elevated (29 mEq/L), which is characteristic of metabolic alkalosis, not acidosis.
Choice C rationale:
Partially Compensated Metabolic Alkalosis is the most likely interpretation based on the ABG results. The pH is elevated (7.46), indicating alkalosis.
The HCO3 is also elevated (29 mEq/L), which is the primary cause of metabolic alkalosis.
The pCO2 is elevated (46 mmHg), which is a compensatory mechanism to try to normalize the pH. However, the compensation is not complete, as the pH is still slightly elevated.
This partial compensation is consistent with partially compensated metabolic alkalosis.
Choice D rationale:
Partially Compensated Respiratory Acidosis would present with a low pH (less than 7.35) and an elevated pCO2 (greater than 45 mmHg).
The HCO3 would also be elevated, but to a lesser degree than in metabolic alkalosis, as it's a secondary compensatory mechanism.
In this case, the pH is slightly elevated (7.46), making respiratory acidosis less likely.

Choice A rationale:
While PICCs are typically intended for shorter-term use (up to 12 weeks), the fact that a PICC has been in place for 4 weeks is not, in itself, an immediate cause for concern. Regular assessment of the catheter and site is crucial, but the duration of placement alone does not warrant immediate attention.
Choice B rationale:
While it's generally recommended to change PICC dressings every 7 days, a dressing that is 3 days old is not an immediate emergency. The nurse should prioritize changing the dressing as soon as possible, but it does not require the same level of urgency as other potential complications.
Choice C rationale:
A missing securement device is a concern because it can increase the risk of catheter dislodgement or migration. However, it does not necessarily indicate an immediate threat to the patient's well-being. The nurse should promptly address the missing securement device, but it would not be the most pressing issue compared to swelling in the extremity.
Choice D rationale:
Swelling in the upper extremity where the PICC is located is a significant finding that demands immediate attention. It can be a sign of several serious complications, including:
Thrombosis: A blood clot within the vein, which can obstruct blood flow and lead to pain, swelling, and potentially more severe consequences like deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE).
Infection: Inflammation and infection at the insertion site or within the bloodstream, which can cause swelling, redness, warmth, and pain. If left untreated, infection can progress to sepsis, a life-threatening condition.
Phlebitis: Inflammation of the vein, which can cause pain, redness, and swelling along the vein.
Infiltration: Leakage of fluids or medications into the surrounding tissue, leading to swelling and discomfort.
Prompt action is crucial in these cases to prevent further complications and ensure patient safety. The nurse should immediately notify the appropriate healthcare provider, initiate necessary interventions, and closely monitor the patient's condition.