A patient with HIV-1 is curious as to why gabapentin is included in their medication regimen, despite not having a history of seizures. What would be the most appropriate response from the nurse?

Choice A rationale:
It is incorrect to state that the client will not be able to bathe with a central vascular access device.
While certain precautions are necessary to keep the device dry and clean during bathing, bathing is still possible and important for maintaining hygiene.
The nurse should provide specific instructions on how to protect the device during bathing, such as using a waterproof cover or avoiding direct water contact.
Choice B rationale:
It is inaccurate to claim that there is no risk of infection associated with a central vascular access device, even when sterile technique is used during insertion.
Infection is a serious potential complication, and it's crucial to emphasize ongoing infection prevention measures to the client.
The nurse should educate the client about signs and symptoms of infection to watch for and the importance of prompt reporting to healthcare providers.
Choice C rationale:
It is not always necessary to wear a sling on the arm with the central vascular access device.
The need for a sling may depend on the type of device, the client's condition, and the healthcare provider's recommendations.
If a sling is indicated, the nurse should provide instructions on proper use and care to maintain comfort and prevent complications.
Choice D rationale:
This is the correct statement to include in the client's teaching.
Thorough cleaning of the connections prior to accessing the device is essential for preventing infection.
The client should be empowered to advocate for themselves and ensure that all providers follow proper infection control procedures.

Choice A rationale:
Tolerance to the opiate medication is developing. This is the most likely explanation for why the client's pain is no longer being controlled by the same dose of medication. Tolerance is a physiological adaptation that occurs with repeated exposure to opioids, leading to a decrease in their effectiveness over time. This means that the client's body is becoming less responsive to the medication, and a higher dose is needed to achieve the same level of pain relief.
Choice B rationale:
There is likely a history of addiction. While it is possible that the client has a history of addiction, this is not the most likely explanation for why the medication is no longer controlling the pain. Addiction is a complex condition that is characterized by compulsive drug seeking and use, despite negative consequences. It is not simply a matter of tolerance developing.
Choice C rationale:
The client is opiate naive. This means that the client has not previously been exposed to opioids. While opiate-naive clients may be more sensitive to the effects of opioids, they are also more likely to experience side effects, such as nausea and vomiting. The fact that the client has been receiving the same dose of medication for 2 days without experiencing side effects suggests that they are not opiate naive.
Choice D rationale:
Physical dependence. Physical dependence is a state of adaptation that occurs with repeated exposure to opioids, leading to withdrawal symptoms if the medication is abruptly stopped. However, physical dependence does not necessarily mean that the medication is no longer effective in controlling pain.