A nurse is teaching a group of nursing students about brain herniation. Which of the following interventions should the nurse include as a possible treatment for brain herniation?

A. Apply soft restraints to wrists and chest: Using restraints should only be considered as a last resort and should not be the first intervention for managing delirium. Restraints can exacerbate agitation and increase the risk of complications such as skin breakdown, musculoskeletal injury, and psychological distress. Therefore, applying restraints should not be the first action taken by the nurse.

B. Administer antipsychotic medications as prescribed: While antipsychotic medications may be used to manage symptoms of delirium in some cases, they should not be the first intervention for preventing client injury. Additionally, the use of antipsychotics in the ICU requires careful consideration due to potential adverse effects, such as sedation, hypotension, and prolongation of the QT interval. The decision to administer antipsychotic medications should be based on a comprehensive assessment and in consultation with the healthcare team.

C. Administer sedative medications as prescribed: Administering sedative medications may help calm an agitated client with delirium, but it should not be the first intervention for preventing client injury. Sedatives can further impair cognition and increase the risk of falls or other complications. Like antipsychotic medications, the use of sedatives should be based on a thorough assessment and in collaboration with the healthcare team, rather than being the initial action taken by the nurse.

D. Arrange for one-on-one observation for the client: Delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a serious condition that can lead to confusion, disorientation, and an increased risk of injury to the client. The priority intervention for preventing client injury in this situation is to ensure constant monitoring and supervision. By arranging for one-on-one observation, the nurse can provide continuous monitoring of the client's behavior, assess for changes or signs of agitation, and intervene promptly to prevent falls or other injuries.

A. Hypovolemic shock: Hypovolemic shock occurs due to a significant decrease in circulating blood volume, leading to inadequate tissue perfusion. Blood loss, such as that experienced by the client in the scenario, is a common cause of hypovolemic shock. The decrease in blood pressure observed over time is consistent with the compensatory mechanisms of hypovolemic shock, where the body attempts to maintain perfusion to vital organs despite decreased blood volume.

B. Septic shock: Septic shock results from a systemic inflammatory response to infection, leading to vasodilation, increased capillary permeability, and maldistribution of blood flow. While infection can lead to hypovolemia in some cases, the scenario does not provide evidence of infection or systemic inflammatory response as the cause of shock.

C. Obstructive shock: Obstructive shock occurs when there is obstruction to blood flow within the cardiovascular system, such as in cases of pulmonary embolism, cardiac tamponade, or tension pneumothorax. There is no evidence in the scenario to suggest an obstruction to blood flow as the cause of the client's shock.

D. Neurogenic shock: Neurogenic shock results from loss of sympathetic tone leading to vasodilation and relative hypovolemia. It is often associated with spinal cord injury or severe head injury. While neurogenic shock can lead to hypotension, the scenario does not indicate any neurological injury or insult as the cause of the client's shock.