A nurse is teaching a class about the novice-to-expert model for nursing competence to a group of nurses.
A nurse who has some experience but still requires clinical support is in which of the following stages of competence?

Choice A rationale:

Systematic reviews are considered Level I evidence in the hierarchy of evidence in evidence-based practice (EBP). Systematic reviews involve the rigorous and comprehensive synthesis of multiple research studies on a specific topic. This approach minimizes bias and provides the highest level of evidence for making clinical decisions. Systematic reviews typically follow a structured methodology and offer a critical analysis of the existing literature, making them a strong foundation for EBP.

Choice B rationale:

Credible websites are not considered Level I evidence. While some websites may contain reliable information, they vary in quality, and the credibility of the source must be carefully assessed. Relying solely on websites is not the most robust approach in EBP, as it lacks the rigorous systematic review and critical appraisal process of Level I evidence.

Choice C rationale:

Expert opinions are not considered Level I evidence. While expert opinions can be valuable, they are often based on individual experiences and interpretations rather than systematic research. Expert opinions are generally considered lower in the hierarchy of evidence compared to systematic reviews and other forms of research evidence.

Choice D rationale:

Qualitative studies are not considered Level I evidence. Qualitative studies provide valuable insights into the experiences, perceptions, and meanings associated with a particular phenomenon. However, they are typically ranked lower in the hierarchy of evidence compared to systematic reviews and quantitative research studies. Qualitative studies are more appropriate for addressing research questions related to subjective experiences and understanding the "why" and "how" of a phenomenon.

Choice A rationale:

Encouraging family members to call the client is a valuable emotional and social support, but it may not be as effective in reducing social isolation for a client at the end of life. While communication with loved ones is important, it may not fully address the client's need for personal interaction.

Choice C rationale:

Instructing the client to join an online support group can be a useful intervention to reduce social isolation, especially in cases where physical interaction is limited. However, it may not be as effective for all clients, as comfort with technology and online groups can vary. Additionally, it should be one of several strategies used to address social isolation.

Choice D rationale:

Asking the client's friends to text the client is a positive gesture, but it may not be as effective as scheduling home visits with the client. Text messages may not provide the same level of personal interaction and emotional support that physical visits can offer.

Choice B rationale:

Scheduling home visits with the client is the most effective intervention to reduce social isolation in a client at the end of life. It allows for in-person interaction, emotional support, and the opportunity to address the client's physical and emotional needs directly. Face-to-face contact can significantly improve the client's sense of connectedness and reduce feelings of isolation.