A nurse is providing care for a client who is scheduled for electroconvulsive therapy. Which of the following conditions should the nurse identify as an increased risk for complications?

Choice A reason: Instructing pregnant visitors to stay 3 feet away is insufficient, as radiation from a sealed implant requires greater distance (typically 6 feet) or complete avoidance. Pregnant individuals should not visit to minimize fetal exposure, making this precaution inadequate and incorrect for safety.
Choice B reason: Wearing a lead apron shields the nurse from radiation exposure during close contact with the sealed implant, adhering to ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principles. This protects the nurse while providing care, making it a necessary and correct safety measure.
Choice C reason: Placing the client in a semi-private room is unsafe, as radiation from the implant could expose other patients. A private room is required to minimize radiation risk to others, making this action incorrect and against radiation safety protocols.
Choice D reason: Closing the client’s door reduces radiation exposure to others outside the room, as sealed implants emit continuous radiation. This containment measure, combined with signage, ensures safety for staff and visitors, making it a correct and essential action.
Choice E reason: Limiting visitors to 30 minutes per day minimizes cumulative radiation exposure, protecting visitors from the sealed implant’s emissions. Time restrictions are standard in radiation safety protocols, ensuring minimal risk while allowing controlled visits, making this a correct action.

Choice A reason: Encouraging a final hemodialysis treatment contradicts the client’s advance directives, which refuse life-sustaining treatments. Respecting autonomy is paramount, and persuading the client undermines their decision, making this action unethical and inappropriate in this end-of-life scenario.
Choice B reason: Contacting the family to discuss the decision is unnecessary unless the client is incapacitated, which is not indicated. The client’s advance directives guide care, and family input is secondary to the client’s wishes, making this action incorrect and irrelevant.
Choice C reason: Discussing treatment options with the surrogate is inappropriate, as the client is competent and has clear advance directives refusing treatment. The surrogate’s role applies only if the client cannot decide, making this action misaligned with the client’s autonomy and directives.
Choice D reason: Discussing discharge options respects the client’s refusal of treatment and advance directives, focusing on palliative care or home arrangements. This supports autonomy and aligns with end-of-life care principles, ensuring comfort and dignity, making it the correct action.