A nurse is collecting data about the fluid status of four patients.
Which patient should the nurse identify as being at risk for fluid volume deficit?

Choice A rationale:

Avoiding crossing legs at the knees is a correct practice for people with PVD. It helps to prevent constriction of blood flow in the legs. When legs are crossed, pressure is applied to the veins in the lower leg, which can impede blood flow. This can lead to several problems, including:

Increased risk of blood clots Worsening of swelling in the legs Increased pain and discomfort Potential skin damage

Reinforcing this practice with the client is important.

Choice B rationale:

Not going barefoot is also a correct practice for people with PVD. It helps to protect the feet from injuries and infections. People with PVD may have reduced sensation in their feet, making them more susceptible to injuries they may not notice. Additionally, PVD can impair wound healing, so even minor injuries can become serious problems.

Reinforcing this practice with the client is important.

Choice C rationale:

Using a thermometer to check bath water temperature is not directly relevant to PVD management. While it's generally a good safety practice to avoid excessively hot water, which can burn the skin, it's not specifically related to the blood flow issues associated with PVD.

This statement indicates a need for further teaching to focus on PVD-specific self-care measures.

Choice D rationale:

Wearing stockings with elastic tops is generally recommended for people with PVD. These stockings, often referred to as compression stockings, help to improve blood flow in the legs by applying gentle pressure. This can help to reduce swelling, pain, and the risk of blood clots.

Reinforcing this practice with the client is important.

Choice B rationale:

Checking the patency of the tubing is the first and most crucial step in addressing the lack of urinary output in this patient. Here's a detailed explanation of why this is the priority action:

Addresses the Most Likely Cause: Obstruction of the urinary catheter tubing is the most common and easily reversible cause of sudden cessation of urinary output in a patient with a continuous bladder irrigation system.

Prevents Complications: A blocked catheter can lead to a number of serious complications, including: Bladder distention, which can cause pain, discomfort, and potential bladder damage.

Urinary retention, which can increase the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and kidney damage. Hematuria, or blood in the urine, due to clot formation in the bladder or catheter.

Non-Invasive Intervention: Checking the tubing is a simple, non-invasive procedure that can quickly identify and resolve the issue without requiring further interventions or delays in care.

Prioritizes Patient Safety: It's essential to promptly address any potential urinary obstruction to prevent the aforementioned complications and ensure patient safety.

Rationale for Other Choices:

Choice A: Administering a prescribed analgesic:

While pain management is important, it does not directly address the lack of urinary output. Pain medication would be appropriate if pain were assessed to be the cause of the decreased output, but it's not the first priority in this situation.

Choice C: Notifying the provider:

Although the provider should be informed of the situation, checking the tubing for patency is a necessary first step to gather more information and potentially resolve the issue quickly without requiring further intervention.

Choice D: Offering oral fluids:

Increasing fluid intake might be helpful in some cases of decreased urinary output, but it's not the priority action in a patient with a continuous bladder irrigation system and a potential catheter obstruction.