A nurse is providing postoperative care for a patient who has a closed-wound drainage system. Which of the following actions should the nurse perform?

Choice A rationale:

Bilateral flank pain is not a typical sign of an allergic blood transfusion reaction. It can be associated with other conditions, such as kidney problems, musculoskeletal issues, or abdominal aortic aneurysm. While it's important to assess flank pain, it doesn't directly suggest an allergic reaction to the transfusion.

Choice B Rationale:

Distended jugular veins can indicate fluid overload, which could potentially occur during a transfusion. However, it's not a specific sign of an allergic reaction. Fluid overload can result from various causes, including heart failure, kidney problems, or excessive fluid intake. It's crucial to monitor for fluid overload during transfusions, but it doesn't definitively point to an allergic reaction.

Choice C Rationale:

Generalized urticaria, or hives, is a hallmark sign of an allergic reaction. It's characterized by raised, red, itchy welts that can appear on various parts of the body. Hives can develop rapidly and spread extensively. During a blood transfusion, generalized urticaria strongly suggests that the patient's immune system is reacting to a component of the transfused blood, such as proteins or antibodies.

Choice D Rationale:

Blood pressure 184/92 mm Hg is elevated and could be concerning, but it's not specific to allergic reactions. High blood pressure can have various causes, including stress, pain, anxiety, or underlying hypertension. While monitoring blood pressure during transfusions is essential, it doesn't directly indicate an allergic reaction.

Rationale for Choice A:

Refer Questions to the Nursing Supervisor:

While it's essential to involve the nursing supervisor in situations that require their expertise or authority, it's not always necessary for basic inquiries about a patient's presence on the unit.

Disadvantages of referring calls to the nursing supervisor in this scenario:

It could delay the dissemination of essential information to concerned colleagues.

It could increase the workload of the nursing supervisor, potentially diverting their attention from more critical tasks. It could create a perception of a lack of transparency or openness among staff members.

Rationale for Choice B:

Transfer calls directly to the patient’s room:

Transferring calls directly to a patient's room without their consent breaches their privacy and confidentiality. It could also place undue stress on the patient, especially if they are not prepared to receive calls or discuss their health status.

Disadvantages of transferring calls directly to the patient’s room:

It violates the patient's right to privacy and confidentiality. It could disrupt the patient's rest and recovery.

It could place the patient in an uncomfortable position of having to answer questions about their health when they may not feel ready to do so.

Rationale for Choice C:

Acknowledge that the person is a patient on the unit, but give no specific details about the patient’s condition:

This approach strikes a balance between protecting the patient's privacy and providing necessary information to concerned colleagues. It verifies the patient's presence on the unit without disclosing any sensitive details about their health, thus adhering to ethical and legal guidelines.

Advantages of acknowledging the patient’s presence without providing details:

Respects the patient's right to privacy and confidentiality. Aligns with ethical and legal principles of healthcare.

Provides basic information to concerned colleagues without compromising patient information. Helps to establish trust and transparency among staff members.

Rationale for Choice D:

Contact the patient’s provider:

Contacting the patient's provider for every inquiry about the patient's presence is not practical or efficient. It could overburden the provider and delay the relay of information to concerned colleagues.