A nurse is looking after a patient who is 12 hours postoperative following a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and has a 3-way urinary catheter with continuous irrigation.
The nurse observes that there has been no urinary output in the last hour. What should the nurse do first?

Choice A rationale:

It is crucial for the nurse to prioritize patient safety and adhere to professional guidelines when encountering a potential diversion of controlled substances. Informing the charge nurse is the most appropriate initial action for several reasons:

Chain of Command: The charge nurse holds a supervisory position and is responsible for addressing issues within the unit, including concerns about medication diversion. Reporting suspicions to the charge nurse ensures adherence to the established chain of command and facilitates a prompt, organized response.

Confidentiality and Objectivity: The charge nurse is trained to handle sensitive situations discreetly and objectively. They can initiate a thorough investigation while maintaining confidentiality and protecting the rights of all involved parties.

Access to Resources: The charge nurse has access to resources and authority to take immediate action, such as securing medications, initiating patient assessments, and notifying appropriate personnel within the healthcare facility.

Collaboration and Support: The charge nurse can provide guidance and support to the reporting nurse, ensuring their concerns are addressed appropriately and that they feel safe in coming forward with their suspicions.

Rationale for other choices:

B. Reporting the incident directly to the hospital’s security department might be premature without first informing the charge nurse. The charge nurse can assess the situation, gather more information, and determine the most appropriate course of action, which may or may not involve security at this initial stage.

C. Requesting assistive personnel (AP) to monitor the other nurse’s actions is inappropriate. It places a burden on APs who are not trained or authorized to investigate such matters. It could also compromise the integrity of the investigation and potentially jeopardize patient safety.

D. Confronting the other nurse directly is not recommended. It could escalate the situation, create a hostile work environment, and potentially compromise the investigation. It is essential to follow established protocols and involve appropriate personnel to ensure a fair and thorough investigation.

Choice A rationale:

Bilateral flank pain is not a typical sign of an allergic blood transfusion reaction. It can be associated with other conditions, such as kidney problems, musculoskeletal issues, or abdominal aortic aneurysm. While it's important to assess flank pain, it doesn't directly suggest an allergic reaction to the transfusion.

Choice B Rationale:

Distended jugular veins can indicate fluid overload, which could potentially occur during a transfusion. However, it's not a specific sign of an allergic reaction. Fluid overload can result from various causes, including heart failure, kidney problems, or excessive fluid intake. It's crucial to monitor for fluid overload during transfusions, but it doesn't definitively point to an allergic reaction.

Choice C Rationale:

Generalized urticaria, or hives, is a hallmark sign of an allergic reaction. It's characterized by raised, red, itchy welts that can appear on various parts of the body. Hives can develop rapidly and spread extensively. During a blood transfusion, generalized urticaria strongly suggests that the patient's immune system is reacting to a component of the transfused blood, such as proteins or antibodies.

Choice D Rationale:

Blood pressure 184/92 mm Hg is elevated and could be concerning, but it's not specific to allergic reactions. High blood pressure can have various causes, including stress, pain, anxiety, or underlying hypertension. While monitoring blood pressure during transfusions is essential, it doesn't directly indicate an allergic reaction.