A nurse is caring for a patient receiving IV therapy in the left forearm and notices that the site is red, swollen, and warm.
What action should the nurse take first?

NPO status (nothing by mouth) is not a relevant intervention in this situation. It would be indicated for a patient with gastrointestinal issues or prior to a procedure, but it does not address the potential consequences of rapid fluid administration.

Restricting oral intake would not reverse or mitigate the effects of fluid overload that may have already occurred.

It's important to prioritize assessment of the patient's respiratory status, as fluid overload can lead to pulmonary edema, a serious complication.

Rationale for Choice B:

Elevating the head of the bed to high Fowler's position can be helpful in easing breathing for patients with respiratory distress, but it's not the most immediate priority in this case.

Assessing the patient's respiratory status directly through respiratory rate and lung sounds will provide more comprehensive information about potential fluid overload and guide further interventions.

Rationale for Choice C:

Measuring the client's temperature is not directly relevant to the concern of rapid fluid administration.

While fever could be a sign of infection, which might warrant fluid administration, it's not the primary concern in this scenario.

The priority is to assess for potential fluid overload, which could manifest as respiratory distress. Rationale for Choice D:

Checking the client's respiratory rate and lung sounds is the most appropriate action for the nurse to take in this situation.

Rapid infusion of 900 mL of fluid within a short period could lead to fluid overload, which can manifest as: Increased respiratory rate

Crackles in the lungs Shortness of breath Hypoxia

Early identification of these signs is crucial for prompt intervention and prevention of serious complications.

Rationale for Choice A: Obtain vital signs

While obtaining vital signs is important in assessing a patient's overall condition, it is not the first priority in a suspected transfusion reaction.

Vital signs can provide valuable information about the severity of the reaction, but they should not delay the immediate action of stopping the transfusion.

Delaying the cessation of the transfusion could allow for further infusion of incompatible blood or allergens, potentially worsening the reaction and leading to more serious complications.

Rationale for Choice B: Notify the registered nurse

Involving other healthcare professionals is crucial in managing transfusion reactions, but it should not precede stopping the transfusion.

The nurse should prioritize stopping the transfusion to prevent further exposure to potential triggers and then promptly notify the registered nurse for further assessment and interventions.

Timely communication with the registered nurse is essential for coordinating care and ensuring appropriate treatment measures are implemented.

Rationale for Choice C: Administer diphenhydramine

Diphenhydramine, an antihistamine, can be used to treat allergic reactions, but it should not be administered as the first response in this scenario.

The priority is to halt the infusion of the blood product that is potentially causing the reaction.

Administering diphenhydramine before stopping the transfusion could mask the symptoms of the reaction, making it more difficult to assess its severity and progression.

Rationale for Choice D: Stop the transfusion

This is the correct and most immediate action to take when a patient develops itching and hives during a blood transfusion.

These symptoms are indicative of a possible allergic or transfusion reaction, and stopping the transfusion is essential to prevent further complications.

It's critical to act quickly to minimize the amount of incompatible blood or allergens that enter the patient's circulation.

By stopping the transfusion, the nurse can potentially prevent the reaction from worsening and safeguard the patient's well- being.