A nurse is caring for a client with a chronic wound and is discussing smoking cessation. The client does not understand how smoking may impact wound healing. Which of the following would be the best nurse response?

A. There is no redness, warmth, or drainage at the insertion site.

This assessment is crucial for evaluating the status of the abdominal drain site. The absence of redness, warmth, or drainage suggests that the insertion site is healing well without signs of infection or inflammation. It indicates that the drain is functioning properly and that there are no immediate complications related to the drain insertion. This assessment directly addresses the goals related to monitoring the drain site for signs of infection or dysfunction.

B. Drainage from the surgical site is 30 mL less than yesterday.

Monitoring the drainage output from the surgical site is important to assess for changes in drainage patterns. A decrease in drainage volume may indicate reduced fluid accumulation at the surgical site, potentially reflecting improved healing and decreased need for drainage. However, while this assessment is valuable, it is not as directly related to assessing the status of the drain itself or evaluating complications at the insertion site as option A.

C. The patient reports adequate pain control with medications.

Pain control is an essential aspect of postoperative care, but it is not specifically related to assessing the functionality or complications of the abdominal drain. While pain management is important for patient comfort and recovery, it does not directly address the goals related to monitoring the drain site for signs of infection, leakage, or other complications.

D. Urine is clear yellow, and urine output is greater than 40 mL/hr.

While monitoring urine output and characteristics is important for assessing renal function and hydration status, it is not directly related to assessing the abdominal drain or its complications. Clear yellow urine and adequate urine output are generally positive indicators but do not provide specific information about the functionality or status of the drain.

A. Full thickness:

Full-thickness burns involve damage to the entire thickness of the skin, including the epidermis and dermis. They often result in a white, charred, or leather-like appearance and are typically painless due to nerve damage. In the context of the patient's data, the description of "bilateral leg burns present with a white and leather-like appearance" indicates that the burns have penetrated deeply into the skin, suggesting full-thickness burns. The absence of blisters or bleeding is also consistent with full-thickness burns, as these burns often destroy the structures that would form blisters.

B. Superficial:

Superficial burns, also known as first-degree burns, only affect the outer layer of the skin (epidermis).They are characterized by redness, pain, and swelling but do not typically result in blisters or significant skin damage. The patient's description of "white and leather-like appearance" and the absence of blisters or bleeding are not indicative of superficial burns. Therefore, superficial burns are not an appropriate categorization based on the provided data.

C. Partial-thickness superficial:

Partial-thickness superficial burns, also known as second-degree superficial burns, affect the epidermis and part of the dermis. They are characterized by redness, blister formation, and pain. However, the description of "white and leather-like appearance" does not align with partial-thickness superficial burns, as these burns typically do not result in a white or charred appearance. Additionally, the absence of blisters or bleeding is not consistent with partial-thickness superficial burns.

D. Partial-thickness deep:

Partial-thickness deep burns, also known as second-degree deep burns, extend deeper into the dermis compared to partial-thickness superficial burns but do not penetrate through the entire dermis. They are characterized by redness, blister formation, and moderate to severe pain. The absence of blisters or bleeding and the description of "white and leather-like appearance" are more indicative of full-thickness burns rather than partial-thickness deep burns.