A nurse is caring for a client who is 2 days postoperative following a total bilateralmastectomy. The client is tearful and looks away when her surgical dressings are removed. The nurse should place the priority on which of the following actions?

Choice A option:

Dietitian should not be consulted: The dietitian is an essential team member and will work closely with the client to ensure proper nutrition and dietary management. However, in the context of dysphagia, the speech-language pathologist's expertise is needed to determine safe swallowing strategies and food modifications.

Choice B option:

Physical therapist should not be consulted: The physical therapist focuses on maintaining and improving the client's physical function and mobility. While important in ALS management, the physical therapist's role is not directly related to the immediate issue of dysphagia.

Choice C option:

The speech-language pathologist is the correct answer because it specializes in assessing and treating communication and swallowing disorders. In this case, the speech-language pathologist is essential in evaluating the client's swallowing function, recommending appropriate dietary modifications (texture and consistency of foods), and implementing swallowing exercises or strategies to improve swallowing safety.

Choice D option:

Occupational therapist should not be consulted: The occupational therapist assists clients in regaining or maintaining independence in daily living activities. While the occupational therapist may address some aspects of mealtime activities and adaptive strategies, the speech-language pathologist is more specialized in evaluating and treating swallowing difficulties in clients with ALS.

A.The blood pressure dropped from 126/78 mm Hg on Day 1 to 80/60 mm Hg on Day 2.This change could signify worsening clinical status, potentially indicating shock or significant fluid loss.

B.The client's confusion and slow response can indicate a change in neurological status, possibly related to electrolyte imbalances, dehydration, or infection. This is a significant finding that requires immediate attention.

C.The client's skin changed from warm and dry to pale, cool, and clammy, suggesting possible shock or hypoperfusion. This is a critical sign that needs to be communicated to the provider.

D.The sodium level remains within normal limits (144 mEq/L) and does not show significant changes. Therefore, it does not require immediate reporting.

E.While the pain level increased from 3/10 to 6/10, pain itself is subjective and should be monitored closely. It may require adjustment in pain management but is not immediately life-threatening compared to other findings.

F.The heart rate increased from 90/min on Day 1 to 110/min on Day 2, indicating tachycardia. This can signify an underlying issue, such as hypovolemia or sepsis, especially given the other concerning findings.

G.The serum amylase level is significantly elevated on both days, with a sharp increase from 498 units/L to 1,058 units/L. This finding indicates potential pancreatitis or pancreatic injury, which can lead to serious complications. Given the clinical picture of worsening abdominal pain and elevated lipase (which also increased to 1,283 units/L), it is crucial to report this finding to the provider immediately.

H.The respiratory rate increased from 18/min to 22/min, indicating mild respiratory distress. While concerning, it does not represent an acute emergency compared to other findings and should be monitored.

I.The urine output decreased significantly from 400 mL over 8 hours to 100 mL over 6 hours, indicating possible acute kidney injury or dehydration.

J.The client’s temperature has increased from 37.2°C (99°F) to 38.4°C (101.1°F), indicating a possible infection or inflammatory response.

These findings indicate that the client may have severe acute pancreatitis, which can lead to systemic complications such as hypovolemia, shock, hypocalcemia, respiratory failure, and multiorgan failure.