A nurse is caring for a client who has hypertension and recently developed drooping facial features. When contacting the provider, which of the following statements should the nurse include as part of the background component of the SBAR communication tool?
"The client has developed drooping facial features."
"The client may benefit from a neurology consult."
"The client is disoriented and pupils are slow to respond to light."
"The client has a history of hypertension."
The Correct Answer is D
Explanation:
A. "The client has developed drooping facial features."
This statement provides specific information about a recent change in the client's condition, which is relevant background information. It helps the provider understand one of the key reasons for the communication.
B. "The client may benefit from a neurology consult."
While suggesting a neurology consult is a potential recommendation (R) in the SBAR tool, it is not part of the Background (B) component. Background information typically focuses on factual data about the client's history, current condition, and pertinent details relevant to the situation.
C. "The client is disoriented and pupils are slow to respond to light."
Similar to option B, this statement describes the client's assessment findings and current condition rather than providing background information. It would be more appropriate in the Assessment (A) component of the SBAR tool.
D. "The client has a history of hypertension."
This statement provides relevant background information about the client's medical history, specifically their history of hypertension. Including this information in the Background component helps the provider understand the client's baseline health status, which is important for evaluating the current situation.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Explanation:
A. Evaluating the collected data:
This step in EBP involves assessing and analyzing the data that has been gathered through research or other sources. It includes examining the quality, relevance, and reliability of the data to determine its applicability to the clinical question or problem being addressed. Evaluation of data is crucial in EBP to ensure that decisions and interventions are based on sound evidence.
B. Implementing recommendations:
Implementing recommendations is a later step in EBP that comes after evaluating the evidence. Once credible sources have been identified, and the data has been analyzed, recommendations or interventions based on the best available evidence are put into practice. This step involves applying evidence-based guidelines, protocols, or interventions to patient care to improve outcomes and quality of care.
C. Identifying a problem:
This is the initial step in the EBP process where a specific clinical problem or question is identified. It involves recognizing gaps in knowledge, areas of uncertainty, or issues that require improvement in clinical practice. Identifying a problem is essential as it sets the stage for formulating focused research questions and seeking relevant evidence to address the problem effectively.
D. Searching for credible sources:
Searching for credible sources is a critical step in EBP where healthcare professionals gather evidence from reputable and reliable sources. This includes conducting literature searches, accessing databases, and reviewing published studies, clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, and other scholarly sources. The goal is to find the best available evidence to answer clinical questions, guide decision-making, and inform evidence-based practice.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Explanation:
A. Expert opinions:
Expert opinions are valuable in clinical practice and decision-making, but they are considered a lower level of evidence compared to systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Expert opinions are often classified as Level V evidence in the hierarchy.
B. Systematic review
A systematic review is a comprehensive and rigorous synthesis of multiple studies on a particular topic, and it often includes a meta-analysis that statistically combines the results of these studies to provide a high level of evidence. This type of evidence is considered Level I because it provides a strong foundation for making clinical decisions due to its methodological rigor and ability to summarize findings from multiple studies.
C. Credible websites:
Credible websites can provide valuable information, but they are not classified as Level I evidence. The evidence hierarchy typically places systematic reviews and meta-analyses at the highest level due to their methodological rigor and synthesis of multiple studies.
D. Qualitative studies:
Qualitative studies are valuable for exploring complex phenomena and understanding individuals' experiences, beliefs, and perspectives. However, they are generally considered lower in the hierarchy of evidence compared to systematic reviews and RCTs, which are categorized as Level I evidence.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today