A nurse is caring for a client who has hypertension and recently developed drooping facial features. When contacting the provider, which of the following statements should the nurse include as part of the background component of the SBAR communication tool?
"The client has developed drooping facial features."
"The client may benefit from a neurology consult."
"The client is disoriented and pupils are slow to respond to light."
"The client has a history of hypertension."
The Correct Answer is D
Explanation:
A. "The client has developed drooping facial features."
This statement provides specific information about a recent change in the client's condition, which is relevant background information. It helps the provider understand one of the key reasons for the communication.
B. "The client may benefit from a neurology consult."
While suggesting a neurology consult is a potential recommendation (R) in the SBAR tool, it is not part of the Background (B) component. Background information typically focuses on factual data about the client's history, current condition, and pertinent details relevant to the situation.
C. "The client is disoriented and pupils are slow to respond to light."
Similar to option B, this statement describes the client's assessment findings and current condition rather than providing background information. It would be more appropriate in the Assessment (A) component of the SBAR tool.
D. "The client has a history of hypertension."
This statement provides relevant background information about the client's medical history, specifically their history of hypertension. Including this information in the Background component helps the provider understand the client's baseline health status, which is important for evaluating the current situation.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is ["B","C","D","E","F"]
Explanation
Explanation:
A. What were the costs associated with the research?
While the costs associated with research can be important in certain contexts, such as resource allocation or budget considerations, it is not typically a primary consideration in the critical appraisal of research evidence for evidence-based practice.
B. Does the study have reliability?
Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of research findings. It is important to assess whether the study's methods and measurements are reliable to ensure that the results are trustworthy and reproducible.
C. Is the research applicable to other populations?
Applicability or generalizability of research findings refers to whether the results can be applied to populations or settings beyond those directly studied in the research. Evaluating applicability helps determine the relevance of the study findings to different patient populations or clinical scenarios.
D. What methods were used to conduct the research?
Understanding the research methods is crucial for evaluating the quality and rigor of the study. This includes assessing the study design, sampling methods, data collection procedures, interventions or exposures studied, and statistical analyses used.
E. How were the study results analyzed?
Examining how the study results were analyzed helps determine the validity and reliability of the findings. It is important to assess whether appropriate statistical methods were used, whether potential biases were addressed, and whether the results are robust and meaningful.
F. What was the purpose of the study?
Understanding the purpose or research question of the study is fundamental for evaluating its relevance and significance to clinical practice. The research question should be clearly stated and align with the study's objectives, methods, and conclusions.
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Explanation:
A. Open access peer-reviewed articles must be purchased by the user.
This statement is not accurate. Open access peer-reviewed articles are freely available to users without the need for purchase. They are published under an open access model, making them accessible to anyone with an internet connection.
B. Peer-reviewed articles are not considered scholarly sources of evidence.
This statement is incorrect. Peer-reviewed articles are indeed considered scholarly sources of evidence. They undergo a rigorous peer-review process where experts in the field review the content for accuracy, validity, and reliability before publication.
C. Editorial opinion articles by journalists can be as relevant as peer-reviewed articles.
This statement is generally not accurate in the context of evidence-based practice. While editorial opinion articles may offer valuable insights and perspectives, they are not subjected to the same level of scrutiny and review as peer-reviewed articles. Peer-reviewed articles are typically considered more reliable and credible sources of evidence in healthcare and academic settings.
D. Peer-reviewed articles have been through laborious review by other professionals.
This statement is correct. Peer-reviewed articles undergo a thorough review process by other professionals in the same field before they are accepted for publication. This review process ensures that the research and information presented in the article meet high standards of quality, accuracy, and validity.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
