A nurse's inadvertent medication error results in a severe allergic reaction and prolongs the client's hospitalization. The client could rightfully sue the nurse for which of the following?
Battery
Assault
Abuse
Malpractice
The Correct Answer is D
Explanation:
A. Battery: Battery refers to intentional harmful or offensive touching without consent. In the context of healthcare, it usually involves physical contact or procedures performed without the patient's consent. An inadvertent medication error, even if it causes harm, does not typically constitute battery unless there was an intentional act of administering the wrong medication against the patient's will.
B. Assault: Assault is the threat of harmful or offensive contact. It involves creating a reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact in the patient's mind. An inadvertent medication error, while it may cause harm, does not typically constitute assault unless there was an intentional threat of harm made to the patient.
C. Abuse: Abuse involves the intentional mistreatment or harm of another person. An inadvertent medication error is not considered abuse unless there was an intentional act to harm the patient.
D. Malpractice: Malpractice refers to professional negligence or failure to provide the standard of care expected in a particular profession, such as nursing. In the scenario described, the inadvertent medication error resulting in a severe allergic reaction and prolonging the client's hospitalization could be considered a case of malpractice. The nurse failed to meet the standard of care expected in administering medications safely, leading to harm to the patient.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Explanation:
A. "Reliance on personal experiences is important to the process of EBP."
This statement is not accurate in the context of evidence-based practice (EBP). EBP emphasizes the use of the best available evidence from research, combined with clinical expertise and patient values and preferences. While personal experiences can provide context, they should not be the primary basis for decision-making in EBP.
B. "Identifying the problem is the first step of the EBP process."
This statement is correct. The first step in the EBP process is identifying a clinical problem or question that requires evidence-based intervention or decision-making. This step involves clearly defining the issue and understanding its significance.
C. "Reviewing the effectiveness of the findings is the last step of the EBP process."
This statement is not accurate. While evaluating the effectiveness of the chosen intervention or practice change is an essential component of EBP, it is not necessarily the last step. EBP involves an iterative process where findings are continuously evaluated, integrated into practice, and refined based on ongoing evidence and outcomes.
D. "There are four steps in the process of EBP."
This statement is not entirely accurate. While different models and frameworks may outline EBP in different steps or stages, it typically involves multiple steps that include formulating a clinical question, searching for evidence, critically appraising the evidence, applying the evidence to practice, and evaluating outcomes.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Explanation:
A. Expert opinions:
Expert opinions are valuable in clinical practice and decision-making, but they are considered a lower level of evidence compared to systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Expert opinions are often classified as Level V evidence in the hierarchy.
B. Systematic review
A systematic review is a comprehensive and rigorous synthesis of multiple studies on a particular topic, and it often includes a meta-analysis that statistically combines the results of these studies to provide a high level of evidence. This type of evidence is considered Level I because it provides a strong foundation for making clinical decisions due to its methodological rigor and ability to summarize findings from multiple studies.
C. Credible websites:
Credible websites can provide valuable information, but they are not classified as Level I evidence. The evidence hierarchy typically places systematic reviews and meta-analyses at the highest level due to their methodological rigor and synthesis of multiple studies.
D. Qualitative studies:
Qualitative studies are valuable for exploring complex phenomena and understanding individuals' experiences, beliefs, and perspectives. However, they are generally considered lower in the hierarchy of evidence compared to systematic reviews and RCTs, which are categorized as Level I evidence.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today