A nurse is caring for a client who has a terminal illness and wishes to discuss hospice care. Which of the following statements by the nurse demonstrates veracity?

A) The surgeon should delay surgery until he can obtain informed consent from a parent:

This option is not feasible in emergencies where immediate surgical intervention is required to save the client's life or prevent further harm. Delaying surgery could jeopardize the client's health and violate the principle of beneficence, which prioritizes the client's well-being.

B) The client's pediatrician can obtain implied consent:

While pediatricians often play a role in providing medical care to minors, implied consent typically pertains to emergency situations where immediate intervention is necessary, and obtaining consent from a parent or legal guardian is not possible. In this scenario, the surgeon, rather than the pediatrician, would be responsible for obtaining consent.

C) The surgeon can proceed with the surgery by invoking implied consent:

In emergency situations where immediate surgical intervention is required to prevent harm or save a client's life, healthcare providers may proceed with treatment under the doctrine of implied consent. Implied consent assumes that a reasonable person would consent to necessary medical treatment if they were able to do so. However, the specific legal requirements for invoking implied consent may vary depending on jurisdiction and institutional policies.

D) The surgeon can obtain informed consent from the client's adult cousin:

While obtaining consent from a close family member may be necessary in certain situations, such as when a parent is unavailable, it may not be legally sufficient in emergency situations where immediate action is required. Additionally, the legal authority to provide consent may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the client's age. In this scenario, relying on informed consent from the client's adult cousin could delay necessary surgical intervention and may not be appropriate without further legal clarification.

A) Informed consent:

While informed consent documents provide information about the proposed surgical procedure, they typically do not include information about organ donation. Informed consent focuses on the risks, benefits, and alternatives of the procedure being performed, as well as the client's agreement to undergo the procedure.

B) Advance directives:

Advance directives, such as a living will or healthcare proxy, can contain information about a client's preferences regarding organ donation. These documents specify the client's wishes regarding medical interventions, including organ donation, in the event that they become incapacitated and unable to make decisions for themselves. Advance directives guide healthcare providers and family members in honoring the client's preferences regarding end-of-life care and organ donation.

C) Do-not-resuscitate order:

A do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order instructs healthcare providers not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest. While organ donation preferences may be discussed in the context of end-of-life care decisions, a DNR order specifically pertains to resuscitative measures and does not provide information about organ donation.

D) Provider's prescription:

A provider's prescription typically pertains to specific medications or treatments ordered by the healthcare provider for the client's care. It does not typically contain information about organ donation. Organ donation preferences are typically documented in advance directives or other specific forms related to donation programs.