A nurse is assisting in the care of a client.

Admission Assessment.

1500: Client transferred from postanesthesia care unit, following a left lung lobectomy.

Client alert and oriented to person, place, time,. and situation.

Reports pain as 3 on a scale of 0 to 10. Dressing dry and intact to left chest.

Water seal chest tube drainage system has 100 mL sanguineous drainage.

Right lung sounds clear.

Left lung sounds diminished.

For each potential nursing action, click to specify if the potential action is. indicated or contraindicated for the client who has a chest tube.

Choice A rationale:

Placing a pulse oximeter on the client's finger to assess oxygen saturation is important, but in this scenario, establishing a patent airway takes priority. The client's cyanosis and shallow respirations indicate a severe respiratory distress, and the nurse should first ensure the client's ability to breathe before assessing oxygen levels.

Choice B rationale:

Establishing a patent airway is the priority action because the client's shallow respirations and cyanosis indicate a compromised airway and inadequate oxygenation. Ensuring a clear airway is crucial for the client's survival.

Choice C rationale:

Checking the client's pulse rate is an important assessment but should not take precedence over addressing the airway and breathing issues. The client's respiratory distress is a more immediate concern.

Choice D rationale:

Administering oxygen is an appropriate intervention, but it should not be done before ensuring a patent airway. The nurse must prioritize actions to address the most critical issue first.

Choice A rationale:

An entry on a nursing blog, while potentially informative, does not provide the same level of evidence-based information as a peer-reviewed journal article. Blog posts may not undergo rigorous peer review and may lack the scientific rigor and credibility associated with peer-reviewed research. Therefore, choice A is not the best source for evidence-based information.

Choice B rationale:

Information from a wound care product vendor may be biased and influenced by commercial interests. Vendors often aim to promote their products, and the information they provide may not be impartial or based on rigorous scientific research. Therefore, choice B is not the best source for evidence-based information.

Choice C rationale:

A peer-reviewed journal article is considered one of the most reliable sources of evidence-based information in healthcare. Such articles undergo a thorough review process by experts in the field to ensure the accuracy, quality, and validity of the research findings. Peer-reviewed articles provide credible and up-to-date information based on scientific research and are widely recognized as a gold standard in evidence-based practice. Therefore, choice C is the correct answer as it offers the best evidence-based information.

Choice D rationale:

First-hand experience with wound care products, while valuable, may not necessarily provide the most comprehensive or up-to-date information. Personal experiences can vary, and healthcare practices evolve over time based on research and new evidence. Therefore, choice D is not the best source for evidence-based information.