A hospice nurse is caring for a client who has a terminal illness and reports severe pain. After the nurse administers the prescribed opioid and benzodiazepine, the client becomes somnolent and difficult to arouse. Which of the following actions should the nurse take?

a. Transport the client to the operating room without verifying informed consent:

This option suggests an urgent response, prioritizing the immediate need for surgery over the formal process of obtaining informed consent. In certain emergency situations, such as when a patient's life or health is in imminent danger and obtaining consent is not feasible, healthcare providers may proceed with treatment or surgery to prevent further harm or loss of life. However, this approach should be guided by established protocols, legal considerations, and the principle of providing the best possible care for the patient.

b. Delay the surgery until the nurse can obtain informed consent:

This option advocates for ensuring that the patient's autonomy and rights are respected by obtaining informed consent before proceeding with surgery. While obtaining consent is essential, delaying surgery may not always be feasible or advisable in emergency situations where prompt intervention is necessary to prevent deterioration of the patient's condition. However, if circumstances allow, making efforts to obtain informed consent is ethically and legally preferable.

c. Obtain telephone consent from the facility administrator before the surgery:

This option proposes seeking consent from a designated authority within the healthcare facility, such as a facility administrator, via telephone. While this approach may be practical in some cases, it may not always be sufficient to ensure that the patient's rights are fully respected, particularly if the administrator does not have the legal authority to provide consent on behalf of the patient. In emergency situations, obtaining consent from a legally authorized representative of the patient, if available, is generally preferred.

d. Ask the anesthesiologist to sign the consent:

This option involves delegating the responsibility of signing the consent form to another member of the healthcare team, in this case, the anesthesiologist. However, consent for surgery should ideally be obtained directly from the patient or their legally authorized representative, as they are the ones who have the right to make decisions about their medical care. Relying on another healthcare provider to sign the consent form may not adequately protect the patient's autonomy and legal rights.

a. A client is refusing care from assistive personnel of the opposite gender:

This situation involves the client's right to refuse care based on personal preferences or cultural beliefs. While it requires attention and respect for the client's wishes, it may not pose an immediate risk to patient care or staff safety.

b. No transport assistance is available to take a client to physical therapy:

This can be resolved by contacting the transportation department or finding an alternative solution, but it is not a critical issue that requires immediate attention.

c. Two nurses had a heated disagreement about a scheduling issue:

While workplace conflicts should be addressed to promote a positive work environment, a heated disagreement about a scheduling issue may not pose an immediate threat to patient care. However, if the disagreement escalates or affects staff morale, it could impact unit functioning and require intervention.

d. Three staff members have called to say they will be absent:

This situation has the most immediate impact on the overall functioning of the unit. Staffing shortages can affect patient care and safety, so it is crucial to address this issue promptly to ensure adequate coverage and maintain the quality of care.