A home health nurse is teaching a new parent about caring for his 1-week-old infant. Which of the following statements by the client indicates an understanding of the teaching?

Choice A reason: A communication board is for speech or cognitive issues, not visual impairment, where indirect lighting aids vision. Assuming a board is appropriate risks ineffective communication, potentially frustrating the client, critical to avoid in ensuring clear interaction for visually impaired clients in care settings.

Choice B reason: An interpreter is for language barriers, not visual impairment, where indirect lighting enhances visibility. Assuming an interpreter is needed risks misaligned communication strategies, potentially reducing clarity, critical to prevent in ensuring effective teaching and interaction for clients with visual impairments.

Choice C reason: Indirect lighting reduces glare, improving visibility for visually impaired clients, enhancing communication and safety. This understanding is critical for effective interaction, ensuring client comfort, promoting independence, and supporting accurate information exchange, essential for care delivery in clients with visual impairments.

Choice D reason: Collaborating with a speech therapist addresses speech issues, not visual impairment, where indirect lighting is key. Assuming therapist involvement is relevant risks overlooking visual needs, potentially reducing communication efficacy, critical to avoid in supporting visually impaired clients in healthcare settings.

Choice A reason: Potential complications must be explained before consent to ensure the client understands risks like bleeding or infection, supporting informed decision-making. This is legally required, critical for ethical care, preventing misunderstandings, and ensuring the client is fully aware of colon resection’s potential adverse outcomes before signing.

Choice B reason: Possible alternative treatments, like medication or less invasive procedures, must be discussed to ensure informed consent, allowing the client to weigh options. This is essential for autonomy, critical for ethical practice, ensuring clients understand all viable paths before agreeing to a colon resection procedure.

Choice C reason: An explanation of the procedure, including what a colon resection entails, is required for informed consent, ensuring the client understands the surgical process. This promotes transparency, critical for legal and ethical standards, enabling informed decisions and reducing anxiety before signing the consent form.

Choice D reason: Expected outcomes, such as symptom relief or recovery timeline, must be provided to clarify the procedure’s benefits, ensuring informed consent. This is crucial for setting realistic expectations, supporting client autonomy, and ensuring understanding of colon resection’s purpose, critical for ethical surgical consent processes.

Choice E reason: Cost of the procedure is not typically required for informed consent, which focuses on medical risks, benefits, and alternatives. Assuming cost is necessary risks diverting focus from clinical information, potentially overwhelming the client, critical to avoid in ensuring informed consent for colon resection surgery.