A client recovering in the intensive care unit following a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stent placement is receiving an IV infusion of tirofiban and has a compression device on the right inguinal PCI access site. When the client reports pain at the PCI access site, which action should the nurse take?
Administer an IV narcotic analgesic.
Adjust compression device until client is comfortable.
Turn the client to a left side-lying position.
Assess the femoral PCI access site for a hematoma.
The Correct Answer is D
Choice A reason: Administering an IV narcotic masks pain without addressing its cause. Pain at the PCI site may indicate hematoma or arterial injury, common post-PCI due to vessel trauma and tirofiban’s antiplatelet effects. Assessing the site identifies bleeding, critical to prevent complications like hemorrhage before providing analgesia.
Choice B reason: Adjusting the compression device without assessment risks worsening a hematoma, as excessive pressure impairs flow, while insufficient pressure fails to control bleeding. Tirofiban increases bleeding risk. Assessing for hematoma ensures proper management, preventing vascular complications, making adjustment premature without confirming the pain’s cause.
Choice C reason: Turning to a left side-lying position does not address PCI site pain, potentially from hematoma or arterial injury. Post-PCI, supine positioning minimizes site stress. Assessing for hematoma, exacerbated by tirofiban’s anticoagulation, is critical to detect bleeding, preventing complications like retroperitoneal hemorrhage over positional changes.
Choice D reason: Assessing the femoral PCI site for hematoma is essential, as pain may indicate bleeding, common post-PCI with tirofiban’s platelet inhibition. Hematoma can compress vessels, causing ischemia or rupture, requiring urgent intervention like compression or surgery. This addresses the pathophysiological risk, ensuring vascular stability and patient safety.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Topical corticosteroids reduce eczema’s inflammation by inhibiting cytokines, alleviating antecubital vesicles. Heat lamps dry skin, worsening irritation and cracking. Encouraging steroids addresses the inflammatory pathophysiology, promoting healing, making this the most effective response for managing eczema and correcting harmful self-treatment.
Choice B reason: Chemical debridement is for necrotic tissue, not eczema’s inflammatory vesicles. Heat lamps exacerbate dryness, but debridement does not address immune-mediated inflammation. Corticosteroids target the cytokine-driven process, making debridement inappropriate for eczema’s pathophysiology, which requires anti-inflammatory treatment.
Choice C reason: Restricting heat to 15–20 minutes does not mitigate harm, as heat dries eczema lesions, disrupting the skin barrier and increasing infection risk. Corticosteroids reduce inflammation, addressing vesicles. Heat worsens epidermal damage, making this response ineffective compared to targeting the inflammatory cause.
Choice D reason: A sling for arm elevation is irrelevant for localized eczema, an inflammatory dermatitis, not edema requiring elevation. Heat lamps aggravate dryness, and corticosteroids treat inflammation, addressing immune-mediated pathology more effectively than positional changes, which do not impact eczema’s skin symptoms.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A reason: Using a heating pad is contraindicated in Raynaud’s, as reduced sensation from vasospasm risks burns. Raynaud’s involves cold-triggered arteriolar constriction, reducing blood flow. Heat does not address vasospasm’s pathophysiology and may cause tissue damage, making this instruction inappropriate compared to cold protection strategies.
Choice B reason: Wearing gloves when handling cold items prevents vasospasm in Raynaud’s, where cold triggers arteriolar constriction, causing ischemia and pain. Protecting extremities maintains blood flow, preventing episodes. This directly addresses the disease’s pathophysiological trigger, making it the most effective instruction for managing Raynaud’s symptoms.
Choice C reason: Knee-high support stockings improve venous return, relevant for venous insufficiency, not Raynaud’s arterial vasospasm. Stockings do not prevent cold-induced vasoconstriction, the primary trigger. Gloves for cold exposure directly mitigate vasospastic episodes, making this instruction less effective for Raynaud’s disease management.
Choice D reason: Regular walking improves overall circulation but does not prevent Raynaud’s vasospastic episodes, triggered by cold or stress. While exercise supports vascular health, avoiding cold exposure with gloves is more targeted, directly reducing arteriolar constriction and ischemic symptoms, making walking a secondary recommendation.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
