A client has a prescription for NPH insulin 25 units before breakfast and insulin aspart before meals and hour of sleep per sliding scale. The sliding scale parameters are:. 0 units for finger stick glucose less than 170 mg/dL;. 5 units for finger stick glucose 171 to 219 mg/dL;. 10 units for finger stick glucose 220 to 269 mg/dL;. 15 units for finger stick glucose 270 to 300 mg/dL.

Call healthcare provider for finger stick glucose greater than 300 mg/dL. The client's 0730 finger stick glucose is 271 mg/dL. What is the total amount of insulin this client should receive? (Enter numeric value only.).

The correct answer is choice B: Monitor the client's hearing. Choice A rationale:

Observing the skin for a rash is not relevant to assessing for signs of ototoxicity. Aminoglycosides can cause skin reactions, but this is not a specific sign of ototoxicity.

Choice B rationale:

Monitoring the client's hearing is essential when administering aminoglycosides because these medications can cause ototoxicity, which is damage to the inner ear and auditory nerve leading to hearing loss or tinnitus. Regular hearing assessments can help detect any changes in hearing and prompt appropriate interventions.

Choice C rationale:

Measuring the urinary output is not directly related to assessing for ototoxicity.

Aminoglycosides can cause kidney toxicity, but this is a separate concern from ototoxicity. Choice D rationale:

Checking for changes in vision is not specifically associated with aminoglycoside administration. Vision changes are not a common side effect of these medications, so it would not be a primary assessment in this situation.

The injury description by the mother varies from the child's version.

Choice A rationale:

The practical nurse (PN) should note the significant indicator of possible child abuse, which is the discrepancy between the mother's description of the injury and the child's version. In cases of child abuse, perpetrators often provide inconsistent or conflicting explanations about how the injuries occurred, raising suspicion of maltreatment. This inconsistency can be a red flag for the PN to further assess the situation and, if necessary, report concerns to the appropriate authorities.

Choice B rationale:

While the child looking at the floor when answering questions might be a behavior worth noting, it alone is not a definitive indicator of child abuse. Children may exhibit various emotional responses for various reasons, and it requires further assessment to determine if there are signs of abuse.

Choice C rationale:

The healing of abrasions on the child's arms, legs, and chest does not necessarily indicate child abuse. Children are active and prone to minor injuries, which are a normal part of growing up. The PN should investigate further to determine the cause of the injuries.

Choice D rationale:

The mother describing in detail what she did for her injured child does not automatically suggest child abuse. It is essential for the PN to gather more information and conduct a comprehensive assessment before drawing any conclusions.