Which nursing intervention is most effective in determining the severity of a client’s pain?
Compare the client’s current vital signs to the admission baseline.
Review the client’s medical history and admission assessment.
Note how frequently doses of analgesics have been administered.
Ask the client to describe the intensity of the pain being experienced.
The Correct Answer is D
Choice A reason: Comparing vital signs to baseline may show tachycardia from pain-induced sympathetic activation, but this is non-specific, as fever or anxiety can mimic these. Pain is subjective, involving nociceptor signaling, and the client’s direct intensity description provides the most accurate severity measure, guiding targeted treatment.
Choice B reason: Reviewing medical history provides pain context but not current severity. Pain perception involves spinal and cortical nociceptive pathways, and only the client’s description quantifies intensity. Historical data informs diagnosis, but direct assessment is more precise for evaluating present pain, ensuring appropriate analgesic intervention.
Choice C reason: Noting analgesic frequency suggests pain control needs but not current severity. Frequent dosing may indicate tolerance or inadequate relief, not intensity. Pain’s subjective nature, mediated by neural pathways, requires the client’s report to assess severity accurately, guiding dosing over indirect medication usage patterns.
Choice D reason: Asking the client to describe pain intensity directly captures their subjective experience, mediated by nociceptors and cortical perception. Using a 0–10 scale quantifies severity, guiding precise analgesia. This is most effective, as pain is personal, ensuring accurate assessment and tailored treatment to alleviate discomfort effectively.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A reason: Observing chest wall shape assesses for abnormalities like barrel chest, not tactile fremitus. Fremitus involves feeling vocal vibrations, increased in pneumonia due to consolidated lung tissue. Visual inspection does not evaluate vibration transmission, making it irrelevant for assessing fremitus in suspected pneumonia.
Choice B reason: Tactile fremitus is assessed by placing the palm on the chest while the client speaks, feeling vibrations through consolidated lung tissue in pneumonia. Fluid-filled alveoli enhance sound transmission, increasing fremitus. This directly evaluates lung pathology, confirming consolidation, critical for diagnosing pneumonia’s extent and severity.
Choice C reason: Using a stethoscope assesses breathing sounds like crackles, not tactile fremitus, which requires palpation of vocal vibrations. While breath sounds aid pneumonia diagnosis, fremitus specifically evaluates consolidation via vibration, making stethoscope use incorrect for this physical assessment technique focused on lung tissue density.
Choice D reason: Compressing tissue for crackling assesses crepitus or subcutaneous emphysema, not fremitus. In pneumonia, fremitus increases due to consolidation, not tissue compression. This method is irrelevant, as fremitus relies on vocal vibration transmission through palpation, making it inappropriate for assessing pneumonia-related lung changes.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A reason: Assessing body image disturbance is relevant in adolescents but not the priority with self-harm fears and wrist scars, indicating high suicide risk from psychological distress or serotonin dysregulation. A suicidal risk assessment evaluates immediate safety, addressing the neurobiological urgency of potential self-injury over body image concerns.
Choice B reason: Completing a suicidal risk assessment is critical, as self-harm fears and wrist scars suggest active suicidal ideation or past attempts, possibly from depression or trauma. Assessing intent, plan, and means guides urgent interventions like hospitalization, addressing psychological and neurochemical risks to prevent self-injury in this high-risk client.
Choice C reason: Exploring life events provides context for self-harm but is secondary to assessing suicide risk. Stressors may trigger cortisol or serotonin imbalances, contributing to ideation, but evaluating immediate risk of self-harm is urgent to ensure safety, preventing lethal outcomes in an adolescent with evident self-harm history.
Choice D reason: Praising the client for seeking help is supportive but not the priority when self-harm fears and scars indicate high suicide risk. Positive reinforcement does not address immediate evaluation of intent or plan, critical to prevent harm and manage underlying psychological or neurochemical issues promptly.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
