When caring for a client, the nurse knows the best method to reduce healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) is to do what?

Choice B rationale:

Call for additional staff to assist with the transfer. The nurse's priority in this situation is ensuring the safety of the client during the transfer from the chair to the bed. Calling for additional staff provides the necessary support to safely move the client, minimizing the risk of falls or injuries. It is crucial to have an adequate number of staff members to assist in transfers, especially when the client's mobility is compromised.

Choice A rationale:

Obtain a walker for the client to use to transfer back to bed. While a walker can be helpful for mobility, the client has already asked to return to bed, indicating the immediate need for assistance. Waiting to obtain a walker could delay the transfer, potentially putting the client at risk.

Choice C rationale:

Use a transfer belt and assist the client back into bed. Using a transfer belt is a suitable technique for assisting clients with mobility. However, the nurse's priority in this scenario is to ensure there is enough staff assistance to guarantee a safe transfer. The nurse should not attempt to perform the transfer alone, even with a transfer belt, as it might be unsafe for both the nurse and the client.

Choice D rationale:

Determine the client's ability to help with the transfer. While assessing the client's ability to participate in the transfer is important, it is not the nurse's priority in this situation. The immediate concern is to secure adequate assistance to safely move the client back to bed.

Choice A rationale:

Checking a restrained patient every 45 minutes might be too frequent and could interfere with the patient's rest and comfort, especially if the restraint is necessary for their safety. It could also lead to increased agitation and resistance from the patient, making it more challenging for the healthcare providers to manage the situation effectively.

Choice B rationale:

Checking on a restrained patient every 30 minutes is also too frequent for the reasons mentioned above. Patients need some time to rest and recover, and constant monitoring might be perceived as intrusive and threatening, potentially escalating the situation.

Choice C rationale:

Checking on a restrained patient every hour might not be sufficient, especially if the patient is at high risk of harming themselves or others. Waiting for an hour between checks could lead to dangerous situations, as a lot can happen in that time frame.

Choice D rationale:

Checking on a restrained patient every 2 hours strikes a balance between ensuring the patient's safety and respecting their privacy and comfort. It allows healthcare providers to monitor the patient's condition and intervene promptly if necessary while also giving the patient some space to rest and recover.