During a health history assessment, where is the symptoms description/narrative typically documented?
Review of Systems
Chief Complaint
History of Present Illness
Past Medical History
The Correct Answer is C
Choice A Reason:
The Review of Systems (ROS) is a systematic approach for collecting the patient's self-reported data on all body systems. It is not typically where the narrative of symptoms is documented. Instead, the ROS is used to uncover symptoms the patient may not have mentioned during the initial recounting of their history.
Choice B Reason:
The Chief Complaint (CC) is a concise statement describing the symptom, problem, condition, diagnosis, or other factors that are the reason for the encounter, usually stated in the patient's words¹. While it does include the symptom prompting the visit, it is not the section where a detailed narrative or description of symptoms is provided.
Choice C Reason:
The History of Present Illness (HPI) is indeed where the detailed narrative of the patient's symptoms is documented. It includes the onset of the problem, the setting in which it developed, its manifestations, and any treatments to date. The HPI tells the story of the patient's chief complaint and provides context for the clinical reasoning process.
Choice D Reason:
The Past Medical History (PMH) includes information about the patient's past experiences with illnesses, operations, injuries, and treatments. It does not contain the current symptoms' narrative but rather the patient's health status before the present illness or concern.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A Reason:
An ophthalmoscope is primarily used for examining the interior structures of the eye, such as the retina, and is not typically used for assessing near vision. It provides a view of the fundus of the eye, which is essential for diagnosing various eye conditions but does not directly assess a patient's reading or close-up vision.
Choice B Reason:
The Snellen Chart is traditionally used to measure distance visual acuity and would not be the first choice for assessing near vision. However, there are versions of the Snellen Chart or similar charts designed for near vision assessment, typically held at a reading distance of about 14 inches from the patient. These charts have rows of letters or symbols that decrease in size and are used to determine the smallest print size a person can read.
Choice C Reason:
A magazine can be a practical tool for assessing near vision informally, as it contains various sizes of print and is a good representation of everyday reading material. The nurse can ask the patient to read a specific paragraph to observe their ability to see and comprehend text at a close distance.
Choice D Reason:
A penlight is not used for assessing near vision. It is typically used to assess the pupillary light reflex or to illuminate specific areas of the eye during an examination. The penlight helps to evaluate the response of the pupils to light but does not measure the patient's ability to read or see objects up close.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason:
A formal hearing test, or audiometry, is the most comprehensive method for assessing hearing loss, which can be a side effect of ototoxic medications. These tests can detect both conductive and sensorineural hearing loss, providing a detailed profile of hearing function across different frequencies. For clients receiving ototoxic antibiotics, regular monitoring through formal hearing tests is recommended to detect any early signs of hearing impairment and to implement timely interventions.
Choice B reason:
The rubbing fingers test is a rudimentary hearing screening method where the examiner rubs their fingers together near the patient's ear, asking them to indicate when they hear the sound. While this test can be used as a quick check for hearing loss, it is not as sensitive or specific as formal audiometry and may not detect early or mild hearing loss caused by ototoxic drugs.
Choice C reason:
Tuning fork tests, such as the Weber and Rinne tests, are used to differentiate between conductive and sensorineural hearing loss. These tests can be useful in a clinical setting to provide immediate information about the type of hearing loss; however, they are not as comprehensive as formal hearing tests and may not be sufficient for monitoring ototoxicity.
Choice D reason:
The whisper hearing test involves the examiner whispering words or numbers and asking the patient to repeat them. This test can be useful for detecting significant hearing loss but may not be sensitive enough to detect the early stages of ototoxicity. Moreover, the test's accuracy can be affected by the examiner's voice level and the testing environment.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.