A nurse is reviewing the medical record of a client who had abdominal surgery 2 days ago. The nurse should identify that which of the following findings indicates the client is at risk for delayed wound healing?

Choice A reason: Raising the head of the bed during transfer does not prioritize ergonomic principles. It may strain the nurse’s back or misalign the client, increasing injury risk. Ergonomics focuses on neutral spine alignment and mechanical aids to reduce physical strain during client transfers.
Choice B reason: Placing pillows under the head is a comfort measure, not an ergonomic principle. Ergonomics emphasizes reducing musculoskeletal strain through proper mechanics or devices. Pillows do not directly prevent nurse injuries, unlike transfer devices that minimize physical effort during client movement.
Choice C reason: Using a lateral transfer device, like a slide board, aligns with ergonomic principles by reducing manual lifting and spinal strain. It prevents back injuries, ensuring safe client transfer. This evidence-based practice supports occupational health guidelines, minimizing musculoskeletal risks for nurses during patient handling.
Choice D reason: Standing close during ambulation ensures client stability but is not a primary ergonomic principle. Ergonomics focuses on equipment and mechanics to reduce strain, not proximity, which addresses patient safety more than nurse injury prevention during transfers or repositioning tasks.

Choice A reason: Using a mechanical lift for a 136 kg client unable to assist ensures safety for both client and nurse. Lifts prevent injury by supporting the client’s weight, reducing strain on staff. This adheres to safe patient handling guidelines, minimizing risks of falls or musculoskeletal injuries during transfer.
Choice B reason: Asking another nurse to assist is insufficient for a 136 kg client unable to help, as manual lifting risks injury to staff and client. Mechanical lifts are required for heavy or non-assistive clients to ensure safety, making this option inadequate and unsafe for the transfer scenario described.
Choice C reason: Positioning the client upright before transfer is impractical for a non-assistive client weighing 136 kg, as it requires significant manual effort and risks injury. Mechanical lifts are needed to safely move such clients, ensuring stability and preventing falls, making this action inappropriate for the transfer.
Choice D reason: A sliding board is unsuitable for a 136 kg client unable to assist, as it requires some patient cooperation and strength. It risks injury to staff and client due to the client’s weight and inability to participate. Mechanical lifts are the safer, recommended method for this transfer.