A nurse is preparing to administer amantadine 150 mg PO every 12 hr. The available medication is amantadine 50 mg/5 mL syrup.

How many mL should the nurse administer per dose?

Choice A rationale:

While it's true that the nurse has released the client's information without their explicit consent, this action is justified under the duty to warn and protect.

This duty supersedes the general obligation to maintain confidentiality when there's a serious and imminent threat to identifiable individuals or the public.

In this case, the client's verbal threat to bomb a local church constitutes a credible and foreseeable risk of harm, necessitating the breach of confidentiality to protect potential victims.

Choice B rationale:

Although the nurse's actions may help to avoid malpractice charges by demonstrating responsible care and adherence to ethical obligations, this is not the primary reason for notifying the minister.

The primary goal is to avert harm and fulfill the duty to warn, not to shield oneself from legal liability.

Choice C rationale:

This is the correct answer. The nurse has acted in accordance with the duty to warn and protect, which is a legal and ethical obligation in healthcare.

This duty mandates that healthcare professionals take reasonable steps to warn potential victims and protect the public when a patient communicates a serious threat of harm.

Choice D rationale:

While confidentiality is a cornerstone of healthcare ethics, it's not absolute.

The duty to warn and protect allows for limited breaches of confidentiality when necessary to prevent serious harm, as in this case.

The nurse's actions align with ethical principles and legal requirements, even though they involve disclosing confidential information.

The correct answer is choice b. Administer the morning dose of lithium.

Choice A rationale:

Preparing for gastric lavage is unnecessary because a lithium level of 1.0 mEq/L is within the therapeutic range (0.6-1.2 mEq/L) and does not indicate toxicity.

Choice B rationale:

Administering the morning dose of lithium is appropriate as the current lithium level is within the therapeutic range, indicating that the medication is being managed correctly.

Choice C rationale:

Holding the medication and assessing for early manifestations of toxicity is not necessary since the lithium level is not indicative of toxicity. Toxicity typically occurs at levels above 1.5 mEq/L.

Choice D rationale:

Checking the client’s medication record to assess whether the client has been refusing her lithium is not relevant in this scenario because the lithium level is within the therapeutic range, suggesting compliance with the medication regimen.