A nurse is planning care for a client who is at 32 weeks of gestation and has severe preeclampsia.
Which of the following actions should the nurse plan to take?
Ensure that the side rails are up on the client's bed.
Ambulate the client every 4 hr.
Check the fetal heart rate twice daily.
Provide the client with a low-protein diet.
The Correct Answer is A
Choice A rationale:
The nurse should ensure that the side rails are up on the client's bed. This action is essential for the safety of the client with severe preeclampsia, as it prevents accidental falls or injuries. Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy characterized by high blood pressure and signs of organ damage, and it poses significant risks to both the mother and the fetus. By keeping the side rails up, the nurse can minimize the risk of falls and ensure the client's safety while in bed.
Choice B rationale:
Ambulating the client every 4 hours is not appropriate for a pregnant woman with severe preeclampsia. Preeclampsia can cause high blood pressure, swelling, and proteinuria. It is a serious condition that requires close monitoring and strict bed rest to prevent complications such as seizures or eclampsia. Ambulation may increase the risk of falls and is contraindicated in this situation.
Choice C rationale:
Checking the fetal heart rate twice daily is important in the care of a pregnant client with severe preeclampsia. However, ensuring the client's safety by keeping the side rails up on the bed takes priority. While monitoring the fetal heart rate is crucial for assessing the baby's well-being, it does not address the immediate safety concerns of the client, which can be addressed by maintaining the side rails up.
Choice D rationale:
Providing the client with a low-protein diet is not the correct action for a pregnant woman with severe preeclampsia. In fact, pregnant women with preeclampsia are often advised to increase their protein intake to help manage their condition. A low-protein diet can lead to malnutrition and may not provide the necessary nutrients for both the mother and the developing fetus. The primary focus should be on bed rest, monitoring vital signs, and managing symptoms to prevent complications.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A rationale:
A child who has mononucleosis and reports severe fatigue requires medical attention, but this condition does not pose an immediate life-threatening risk compared to acute epiglottitis. Mononucleosis is a viral infection that can cause fatigue, sore throat, and swollen lymph nodes. While the child should be assessed, the priority is given to the child with acute epiglottitis due to the potential for airway obstruction and respiratory distress.
Choice B rationale:
A child who has Wilms' tumor and an abdominal mass also needs urgent medical evaluation. Wilms' tumor is a rare kidney cancer that primarily affects children. While it requires prompt attention, acute epiglottitis poses a more immediate threat to the airway and breathing.
Choice C rationale:
A child with acute epiglottitis and drooling requires immediate assessment and intervention. Acute epiglottitis is a potentially life-threatening infection that can cause severe swelling of the epiglottis, leading to airway obstruction. The child may have difficulty breathing and may present with the classic drooling sign due to the inability to swallow saliva. Prompt medical intervention, including airway management and appropriate antibiotics, is essential in this situation.
Choice D rationale:
A child with a urinary tract infection and bright red blood in her urine requires medical evaluation, but this condition is not as urgent as acute epiglottitis. Hematuria (blood in the urine) can have various causes, including urinary tract infections or kidney stones. While the child should receive medical attention, it does not take precedence over the immediate threat posed by acute epiglottitis, which requires urgent intervention to maintain the airway.
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A rationale:
Repositioning the NG tube is not the appropriate action for hyperosmolar dehydration. This condition occurs due to an excessive concentration of solutes in the body, leading to a decrease in intracellular water. Repositioning the tube would not address the hyperosmolarity issue.
Choice B rationale:
Increasing the rate of formula delivery may exacerbate the problem by introducing more concentrated formula into the client's system, worsening hyperosmolarity. This choice can lead to further dehydration and electrolyte imbalances.
Choice C rationale:
Adding water to the formula is the correct action in this scenario. Hyperosmolar dehydration requires dilution of the concentrated formula to reduce the osmolarity. By adding water to the formula, the nurse can decrease the concentration of solutes, helping to rehydrate the client effectively.
Choice D rationale:
Switching to a lactose-free formula is not the appropriate intervention for hyperosmolar dehydration. The issue lies in the concentration of the formula, not in its lactose content. Adding water is the more suitable and direct approach to address the problem.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.