A nurse is caring for a female client, 84 years old, in the home environment. The client was recently hospitalized for an exacerbation of heart failure (HF) and moved in with her daughter after the hospitalization. Below is the information available to the nurse for interpretation:

Exhibits

Which of the following are the most appropriate interventions for this client? Select all that apply.

Choice B rationale: Capillary refill time of 6 seconds is significantly delayed and indicates poor peripheral perfusion. This finding suggests that the client may be experiencing decreased cardiac output or hypovolemia, which requires immediate attention to improve circulation and oxygen delivery to tissues.

Choice C rationale: Blood pressure of 90/79 mmHg with a pulse pressure of less than 40 mmHg is a critical finding. The narrow pulse pressure and hypotension indicate potential hypovolemia or shock, which must be addressed urgently to stabilize the client's hemodynamic status.

Choice D rationale: The client’s lack of urine output from the indwelling catheter is concerning and indicates potential kidney dysfunction or decreased renal perfusion. Immediate intervention is necessary to assess and manage potential underlying causes, such as hypovolemia or renal injury.

Choice A rationale: Oxygen saturation of 100% on 40% oxygen is not an immediate concern. While it is important to continue monitoring oxygen levels, the client is currently receiving adequate oxygenation.

Choice A rationale

Placing a client with a head injury in the lateral Trendelenburg position is not recommended due to the risk of increasing intracranial pressure (ICP). This position can impede venous outflow from the brain, thereby exacerbating cerebral edema and ICP. Additionally, it can compromise the airway and lead to aspiration, especially in a client who is vomiting. Proper positioning, such as elevating the head of the bed to 30 degrees, is more appropriate to facilitate venous drainage and reduce ICP while protecting the airway. This choice is scientifically unsound and potentially harmful.

Choice B rationale

Scheduling a repeat CT scan is a critical intervention in this case. The client's condition has changed, evidenced by the onset of projectile vomiting and a dilated, non-reactive left pupil, both signs of potential increased ICP and possible brain herniation. A repeat CT scan will help identify any new or worsening intracranial pathology such as bleeding, swelling, or other changes that were not present initially. Timely imaging is essential for appropriate management and to guide further treatment decisions.

Choice C rationale

Inserting a second large bore IV catheter is vital for ensuring rapid access for fluids, medications, and possible blood products in the event of an acute deterioration. This is especially important in a neurologically unstable client. Having multiple IV access points allows for efficient administration of necessary treatments without delay, which can be crucial in managing worsening intracranial conditions and other emergent needs.

Choice D rationale

While applying artificial tear drops to the left eye might seem beneficial for preventing corneal dryness in a client who cannot blink, it does not address the acute neurological concerns indicated by the pupil changes and vomiting. This intervention is more supportive rather than urgent or diagnostic. The primary focus should be on identifying and managing the underlying cause of the client's deterioration, not on symptom management alone.

Choice E rationale

Repeating the Glasgow coma assessment is necessary to monitor any changes in the client's neurological status. Regular assessment helps track the progression or improvement of the client’s condition, guiding clinical decisions. The change in pupil response and vomiting suggests potential worsening, necessitating continuous and frequent reassessments. Prompt detection of deterioration can lead to quicker intervention and potentially better outcomes.