A nurse is caring for a client who requires a crisis intervention for acute anxiety. Which of the following actions should be the nurse's highest priority?

Choice A rationale:

It is not accurate to state that the provider is required to notify the client's family of their admission. While providers may often choose to involve family members in the care of a client with MDD, this is not a mandatory requirement for voluntary admission.

Disclosing a client's admission without their consent could breach confidentiality and potentially damage trust between the client and healthcare team.

It's essential to respect the client's privacy and autonomy, and to obtain their permission before sharing any information with family members.

Choice C rationale:

It is incorrect to state that a client gives up their right to refuse psychotropic medications upon voluntary admission. Informed consent remains a crucial principle even in an acute mental health setting.

Clients have the right to decline medications or other treatments, even if healthcare providers believe those interventions would be beneficial.

It's important to engage in a collaborative discussion with the client, provide education about treatment options, and respect their decisions.

Choice D rationale:

It is misleading to suggest that a client cannot leave the facility until the provider completes a discharge summary and authorizes discharge.

While providers play a significant role in discharge planning, clients ultimately have the right to request discharge from voluntary admission, even if the provider does not fully agree with the decision.

Providers may need to initiate involuntary commitment procedures if a client poses a serious risk to themselves or others, but this is a separate process with specific legal requirements.

Choice B is the most accurate statement because it emphasizes the importance of informed consent throughout the treatment process. Even in a voluntary admission, clients retain their right to make decisions about their care and to be fully informed about the risks and benefits of any proposed treatments.

Choice A rationale:

Coercion to take necessary prescribed medications is not an appropriate indication for the use of mechanical restraints. It violates the client's right to autonomy and informed consent.

Forcing a client to take medication against their will can lead to psychological trauma, distrust of healthcare providers, and even legal action.

Alternative interventions, such as patient education, negotiation, and behavioral strategies, should be explored first to encourage medication compliance.

If a client is refusing medication due to a lack of understanding, providing clear and concise information about the medication's purpose, benefits, and potential side effects can help facilitate informed decision-making.

Negotiation strategies can involve exploring the client's concerns and preferences, and working collaboratively to find a solution that addresses those concerns.

Behavioral strategies may include positive reinforcement for medication adherence, or the use of techniques such as distraction or relaxation to reduce anxiety associated with medication administration.

Choice B rationale:

Punishment for verbally abusing other clients is also not an appropriate indication for mechanical restraints.

Restraints should never be used as a form of punishment, as this can be considered abuse and can worsen the client's behavior.

Verbal abuse is often a symptom of underlying mental health issues, and it's important to address the root cause of the behavior rather than simply trying to suppress it through restraints.

Alternative interventions for verbal abuse might include de-escalation techniques, conflict resolution strategies, and individual or group therapy to address underlying emotional or behavioral issues.

Choice C rationale:

Discipline for throwing objects at staff in the nursing station is not an appropriate indication for mechanical restraints. Restraints should only be used as a last resort to protect the client or others from imminent harm.

Throwing objects may be a sign of agitation, frustration, or anger, and it's important to address the underlying cause of these behaviors.

Alternative interventions could include de-escalation techniques, providing a safe space for the client to calm down, medication to manage agitation, or behavioral therapy to teach coping skills.

Choice D rationale:

Self-destructive behavior after all previous alternative interventions have been unsuccessful is the only appropriate indication for mechanical restraints among the choices provided.

When a client is at risk of seriously harming themselves, and other interventions have failed to protect them, restraints may be necessary to prevent injury or death.

However, it's crucial to use restraints only as a temporary measure and to continuously monitor the client's condition and behavior.

As soon as the client is no longer at risk of self-harm, the restraints should be removed.