A nurse is caring for a client who has poison ivy and is prescribed diphenhydramine. Which of the following instructions should the nurse give regarding the adverse effect of dry mouth associated with diphenhydramine?

White coating in the mouth: A white coating in the mouth could be a sign of a fungal infection such as oral thrush. Fluticasone, which is a corticosteroid, can increase the risk of developing fungal infections. Therefore, the nurse should instruct the client to report any signs of oral thrush or other unusual changes in the mouth, such as white patches or discomfort, to the provider.
Prompt identification and treatment of oral thrush are necessary to prevent its progression and ensure effective management of the client's condition.
Dry oral mucous membranes: Dry oral mucous membranes are not typically associated with fluticasone/salmeterol use. However, if the client experiences persistent or severe dryness in the mouth or any other unusual oral symptoms, it should be reported to the provider. Dry mouth can sometimes occur as a side effect of medications or indicate other underlying issues that need to be addressed.
Sedation: Sedation is not a common side effect of fluticasone/salmeterol. If the client experiences excessive drowsiness or sedation that interferes with their daily activities, it may be important to report this to the provider. While sedation is not a typical adverse effect of this medication, individual responses can vary, and it is essential to ensure appropriate monitoring and management.
Increased appetite is not typically associated with fluticasone/salmeterol use. It is not a commonly reported adverse effect of the medication. However, if the client experiences significant and unexplained changes in appetite that are concerning or persistent, it may be worth mentioning to the provider during a follow-up appointment or as part of ongoing monitoring.

"The infant's nasal congestion appeared to improve following the administration of hypertonic nasal drops. The infant tolerated the insertion of saline nose drops well, with no signs of distress or adverse reactions. The nasal passages appeared clearer after the instillation, and the infant's breathing appeared less congested. There was no significant increase in respiratory rate or other signs of respiratory distress observed. The intervention seemed to have a positive effect on the infant's nasal congestion."

This statement indicates that the mucolytic medication (hypertonic nasal drops) was administered and had a positive effect on the infant's nasal congestion. It also mentions that the infant tolerated the procedure well without any adverse reactions, such as shortness of breath or fever. The absence of distress or adverse symptoms and the observed improvement in nasal congestion indicate the effectiveness of the medication in the nurse's narrative note. The additional information about the saline nose drops and respiratory rate may not directly address the effectiveness of the mucolytic medication and can be documented separately if necessary.