A nurse is caring for a client who has borderline personality disorder (BPD). As part of the client's plan of care, the nurse reviews the day's schedule with the client each morning.
As the nurse begins to review the schedule with the client, the client says, "Why don't you shut up already? I can read it myself, you know!" Which of the following responses should the nurse give the client?

Choice A rationale:

While a client's unwillingness to accept treatment can be a challenge, it does not, in and of itself, meet the criteria for involuntary hospitalization beyond the initial 72-hour hold.

Forced treatment without a clear and imminent risk of harm can violate a patient's autonomy and rights.

It's crucial for healthcare professionals to balance a patient's right to self-determination with the need to protect individuals from harm.

Choice B rationale:

A client's plan to move out of state, even if it's considered a disruptive decision, does not constitute grounds for involuntary hospitalization.

Individuals have the right to freedom of movement and to make choices about their life, even if those choices are perceived as unwise or problematic.

Choice C rationale:

This is the correct answer because it aligns with the fundamental principle of involuntary hospitalization: to protect individuals who pose a serious risk of harm to themselves or others due to a mental health condition.

This rationale is rooted in the ethical and legal obligation to prevent harm and ensure public safety.

Choice D rationale:

A client's dislike of a neighbor is not a valid reason for involuntary hospitalization. Personal opinions or feelings, even if negative, do not automatically translate into a risk of harm that would justify involuntary confinement.

Choice A: Lock the doors to the unit and secure windows so they cannot be opened: While removing potential means of self-harm from the environment is a safety precaution, it is not the most immediate or effective intervention for a client actively experiencing suicidal ideation who has refused a safety contract. Locking doors and windows may increase anxiety and feelings of entrapment, potentially exacerbating the client's distress and hindering open communication. Additionally, it may not address underlying emotional and psychological factors contributing to the suicidal thoughts.

Choice B: Remove any objects from the client's environment that could be used for self-harm: Similar to Choice A, removing potential means can be a helpful safety measure but should not be the primary intervention in this situation. It is important to recognize that clients can find alternative means if they are determined to self-harm, and focusing solely on environmental control can detract from addressing the root of the suicidal crisis.

Choice C: Assign a staff member to stay with the client at times: This option prioritizes the client's safety and emotional well-being by providing constant support and supervision. A dedicated staff member can:

Monitor the client's behavior and emotional state closely, potentially identifying early warning signs of impending self-harm.

Provide open and non-judgmental support, allowing the client to express their thoughts and feelings freely without fear of being alone with their distress.

Engage in therapeutic communication, helping the client explore alternative coping mechanisms and develop safety plans for managing suicidal urges.

Alert other healthcare professionals if the client's condition deteriorates or if there is any immediate risk of self- harm.

Offer a sense of security and reassurance, knowing someone is constantly available to listen and intervene if needed.

Choice D: Provide the client with plastic eating utensils for meals: While this precaution may reduce the risk of self- harm at mealtimes, it addresses a very specific concern and does not address the broader issue of the client's suicidal ideation. It is also important to consider that plastic utensils may not be effective in preventing self-harm if the client is determined and resourceful.

Therefore, assigning a staff member to stay with the client at all times is the most appropriate and immediate action to prioritize the client's safety and emotional well-being in this situation. This approach fosters open communication, provides continuous support, and allows for early intervention if necessary. While environmental controls and risk assessments can be valuable complementary strategies, they should not overshadow the importance of close human connection and emotional support in crisis situations.