A nurse is caring for a client.

• Medication Administration Record:

  • Budesonide 6 mg PO daily.

• Laboratory Results:

  • Hematocrit (Hct): 47% (Normal range: 37% to 52%)
  • Hemoglobin (Hgb): 16 g/dL (Normal range: 12 to 18 g/dL)
  • Potassium: 3.6 mEq/L (Normal range: 3.5 to 5.0 mEq/L)

• History and Physical:

  • BMI: 16 (Reference Range:18.5 - 24.9)
  • History of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
  • Nonsmoker.
  • New diagnosis of Crohn's disease.

Click to highlight the findings that increase the client's susceptibility to infection.

To deselect a finding, click on the finding again.

Choice A rationale:

Including a note in the medical record that an incident report was completed is a crucial step in documenting the event. It serves as a legal and organizational record of the incident, providing transparency and accountability. This information can be essential for tracking trends, identifying areas for improvement, and ensuring patient safety.

Choice B rationale:

Identifying other people involved with the event in the incident report is also an important step. It helps in determining who was present or responsible during the incident, which can be crucial in investigating the event and identifying potential areas for process improvement.

Choice C rationale:

Including personal opinions regarding an event in an incident report is not advisable. Incident reports should focus on factual, objective information. Personal opinions can introduce bias and subjectivity, which may not be helpful in addressing the root causes of the incident or improving the quality of care.

Choice D rationale:

Identifying the person responsible for the error in the incident report is a valid step, as it helps in assigning accountability and addressing any systemic issues that may have contributed to the error. However, it's essential to do so without assigning blame or making judgments. The emphasis should be on improving processes and preventing similar incidents in the future.

Choice A rationale:

Tell the APs they are acting immature. Telling the APs that they are acting immature is a judgmental and unhelpful approach. It does not demonstrate conflict resolution but rather exacerbates the conflict. This choice is not appropriate for resolving the situation.

Choice B rationale:

Allow the APs to resolve their issues. While allowing individuals to resolve their issues on their own can sometimes work, it is not always the best approach, especially in a healthcare setting where teamwork and patient care are paramount. In this scenario, the nurse should play an active role in resolving the conflict, making this choice less suitable.

Choice C rationale:

Confront the APs to discuss their argument. Confronting the APs to discuss their argument is a proactive approach to conflict resolution. It allows the nurse to address the issue, mediate the disagreement, and work towards a resolution. This choice is the most appropriate and demonstrates effective conflict resolution.

Choice D rationale:

Report the APs to the charge nurse. Reporting the APs to the charge nurse should be considered when the conflict cannot be resolved at the staff level, and it threatens patient care or safety. However, it should not be the first step in resolving a conflict between two individuals. It is a more formal and escalated approach, and in this case, choice C is a more suitable initial response.