A nurse in a well-child clinic is collecting data from four clients. Which of the following findings should the nurse report to the provider as a potential indication of child maltreatment?

Choice A rationale:
After a tonic-clonic seizure, it's common for the person to inadvertently bite their tongue, cheeks, or lips during the convulsive movements. Checking the mouth for any signs of bleeding or injuries is essential to ensure the person's safety and provide appropriate care.
Choice B rationale:
Placing the child's head in a hyperextended position is not recommended after a seizure. In fact, it's important to keep the person's head and neck in a neutral position to prevent potential injury. Hyperextending the neck could lead to strain or other complications.
Choice C rationale:
Giving the child a drink of water immediately after a seizure is not necessary and might be unsafe. The child may still be disoriented or have difficulty swallowing immediately after the seizure. It's best to ensure the child's safety and monitor their condition before offering any fluids.
Choice D rationale:
Administering naloxone intramuscularly is not indicated for a tonic-clonic seizure. Naloxone is an opioid antagonist used to reverse the effects of opioid overdose. Seizures have a different underlying cause, and administering naloxone would not be effective or appropriate in this context.

Choice A rationale:
Correct Choice. Current pregnancy is a contraindication to administering the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. The MMR vaccine contains live attenuated viruses, and it is generally contraindicated during pregnancy due to the potential risk to the developing fetus. Pregnant individuals should wait until after giving birth to receive the MMR vaccine.
Choice B rationale:
Mild ear infection is not a contraindication to administering the MMR vaccine. Mild illnesses, such as mild upper respiratory infections or low-grade fevers, are not typically considered contraindications for vaccination. In fact, immunization might be recommended in these cases to ensure protection against preventable diseases.
Choice C rationale:
A family history of seizures is not a contraindication to administering the MMR vaccine. Seizures are not known to be associated with the MMR vaccine. Therefore, a family history of seizures would not preclude an individual from receiving the vaccine.
Choice D rationale:
Severe peanut allergy is not a contraindication to administering the MMR vaccine. Allergies, including severe peanut allergies, are not considered contraindications for the MMR vaccine. Only individuals with a known severe anaphylactic allergy to a vaccine component (such as gelatin or neomycin) would have a contraindication to receiving the vaccine.