A nurse in a health clinic is assisting in the care of a client diagnosed with chlamydia. The client was prescribed azithromycin 1 g PO once. Which of the following allergy findings in the client's history should the nurse report to the provider?
Allergy to tetracyclines
Allergy to sulfonamides
Allergy to macrolides
Allergy to penicillins
The Correct Answer is C
Choice A reason: Tetracycline allergy doesn’t cross-react with azithromycin, a macrolide. They’re distinct classes, so this isn’t a concern for chlamydia treatment safety.
Choice B reason: Sulfonamide allergy is unrelated to azithromycin’s macrolide structure. No cross-sensitivity exists, making this irrelevant for reporting in this case.
Choice C reason: Azithromycin is a macrolide; allergy to this class risks anaphylaxis. Reporting ensures safe alternative prescribing for chlamydia, a critical safety step.
Choice D reason: Penicillin allergy doesn’t affect azithromycin use; they’re unrelated structurally. This doesn’t require reporting, as no cross-reaction occurs here.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A reason: Wiping yellow crusts disrupts healing; they’re normal post-Plastibell exudate. This shows misunderstanding, as crusts should remain until the ring detaches naturally.
Choice B reason: Snug diapers risk ring displacement or irritation in Plastibell care. Loose fitting is advised, so this indicates a lack of proper technique understanding.
Choice C reason: Applying pressure with gauze controls minor bleeding, a correct response in Plastibell care. It shows understanding of managing complications until medical help is sought.
Choice D reason: Antibiotic ointment isn’t routine for Plastibell; petroleum jelly is used instead. This reflects incorrect care knowledge, potentially causing irritation or infection.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Fidelity is keeping promises and maintaining trust, as the nurse commits to walking daily with the client. This builds therapeutic reliability, reducing anxiety through consistent support, aligning with ethical standards where honoring commitments fosters psychological safety and strengthens the nurse-patient relationship scientifically.
Choice B reason: Justice involves fair resource distribution, not individual promises like walking with a client. This scenario focuses on personal commitment, not equity among patients. Ethically, justice applies to systemic fairness, lacking relevance to this specific supportive action grounded in trust-building principles.
Choice C reason: Nonmaleficence means avoiding harm, but promising to walk exceeds mere harm prevention, aiming to alleviate anxiety actively. While it supports well-being, it’s not the primary principle here. Scientifically, this is more about trust than just safety, distinguishing it from nonmaleficence’s core intent.
Choice D reason: Autonomy respects client decisions, but the nurse’s promise is her initiative, not the client’s choice. It supports, not directs, independence. Ethically, autonomy focuses on self-determination, whereas this action reflects commitment, making fidelity the more fitting principle in this scenario.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.