A nurse in a health clinic is assisting in the care of a client diagnosed with chlamydia. The client was prescribed azithromycin 1 g PO once. Which of the following allergy findings in the client's history should the nurse report to the provider?
Allergy to tetracyclines
Allergy to sulfonamides
Allergy to macrolides
Allergy to penicillins
The Correct Answer is C
Choice A reason: Tetracycline allergy doesn’t cross-react with azithromycin, a macrolide. They’re distinct classes, so this isn’t a concern for chlamydia treatment safety.
Choice B reason: Sulfonamide allergy is unrelated to azithromycin’s macrolide structure. No cross-sensitivity exists, making this irrelevant for reporting in this case.
Choice C reason: Azithromycin is a macrolide; allergy to this class risks anaphylaxis. Reporting ensures safe alternative prescribing for chlamydia, a critical safety step.
Choice D reason: Penicillin allergy doesn’t affect azithromycin use; they’re unrelated structurally. This doesn’t require reporting, as no cross-reaction occurs here.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Palpitations at 34 weeks may signal arrhythmia or preeclampsia-related cardiac strain. This urgent symptom in pregnancy requires immediate provider evaluation.
Choice B reason: Weekly nosebleeds are common in pregnancy from vascular changes, less critical. Without severity, they’re not the priority over cardiac concerns.
Choice C reason: Red, blotchy palms (palmar erythema) are normal in pregnancy from estrogen. It’s benign, not urgent compared to potential heart issues.
Choice D reason: Persistent headaches suggest preeclampsia, but palpitations pose a more immediate cardiac risk. At 34 weeks, this takes reporting precedence.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Diminished pulses signal compromised circulation, a critical cast complication like compartment syndrome. This risks tissue necrosis or amputation if untreated, prioritizing it scientifically, as arterial flow disruption demands immediate intervention to preserve limb viability per vascular assessment standards.
Choice B reason: Ecchymosis suggests bruising, possibly from cast pressure, but isn’t immediately life-threatening like poor circulation. It’s a secondary concern, manageable later. Scientifically, it indicates trauma, not acute vascular emergency, ranking lower in urgency per cast complication protocols.
Choice C reason: Muscle spasms may indicate irritation or pressure, but they’re less urgent than absent pulses. Pain is common in casts, not always critical. Scientifically, this suggests nerve or muscle stress, not imminent tissue loss, making it a lower priority for immediate action.
Choice D reason: One fingerbreadth space is normal, preventing tightness, not a concern. It’s ideal fit, not a problem. Scientifically, this aligns with safe cast application, lacking urgency compared to circulatory threats, as it supports, rather than jeopardizes, limb health.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
