A nurse in a health clinic is assisting in the care of a client diagnosed with chlamydia. The client was prescribed azithromycin 1 g PO once. Which of the following allergy findings in the client's history should the nurse report to the provider?
Allergy to tetracyclines
Allergy to sulfonamides
Allergy to macrolides
Allergy to penicillins
The Correct Answer is C
Choice A reason: Tetracycline allergy doesn’t cross-react with azithromycin, a macrolide. They’re distinct classes, so this isn’t a concern for chlamydia treatment safety.
Choice B reason: Sulfonamide allergy is unrelated to azithromycin’s macrolide structure. No cross-sensitivity exists, making this irrelevant for reporting in this case.
Choice C reason: Azithromycin is a macrolide; allergy to this class risks anaphylaxis. Reporting ensures safe alternative prescribing for chlamydia, a critical safety step.
Choice D reason: Penicillin allergy doesn’t affect azithromycin use; they’re unrelated structurally. This doesn’t require reporting, as no cross-reaction occurs here.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is C
Explanation
Choice A reason: Family history informs genetic risks, not current mobility needs for therapy. Scientifically, it’s less relevant than functional data, as physical therapy focuses on present deficits, not hereditary patterns, making this secondary for referral purposes.
Choice B reason: Prior medications provide context but don’t detail current physical status for therapy goals. Scientifically, recent assessments outweigh past drug use, as therapists need functional baselines, not historical pharmacology, for effective planning.
Choice C reason: Physical assessment findings (e.g., strength, range of motion) directly inform therapy needs, setting baselines for intervention. Scientifically, this data drives rehabilitation plans, aligning with evidence-based practice to target specific deficits for mobility recovery.
Choice D reason: Insurance claims are administrative, not clinical, data. They don’t guide therapy goals or interventions. Scientifically, financial details are irrelevant to physical assessment, making this inappropriate for a referral focused on functional restoration.
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A reason: Exchange transfusion treats severe conditions like hyperbilirubinemia, not HIV. It’s irrelevant for a 10-month-old’s ongoing viral management needs.
Choice B reason: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor boosts neutrophils, not lymphocytes, in neutropenia. HIV targets CD4 cells, making this an ineffective intervention here.
Choice C reason: Droplet precautions suit respiratory infections, not HIV, which spreads via blood/body fluids. Standard precautions suffice, so this isn’t needed.
Choice D reason: Monitoring lymphocyte (CD4) count tracks HIV progression in infants. It guides antiretroviral therapy, a critical ongoing management step at 10 months.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.