A nurse in a health clinic is assisting in the care of a client diagnosed with chlamydia. The client was prescribed azithromycin 1 g PO once. Which of the following allergy findings in the client's history should the nurse report to the provider?
Allergy to tetracyclines
Allergy to sulfonamides
Allergy to macrolides
Allergy to penicillins
The Correct Answer is C
Choice A reason: Tetracycline allergy doesn’t cross-react with azithromycin, a macrolide. They’re distinct classes, so this isn’t a concern for chlamydia treatment safety.
Choice B reason: Sulfonamide allergy is unrelated to azithromycin’s macrolide structure. No cross-sensitivity exists, making this irrelevant for reporting in this case.
Choice C reason: Azithromycin is a macrolide; allergy to this class risks anaphylaxis. Reporting ensures safe alternative prescribing for chlamydia, a critical safety step.
Choice D reason: Penicillin allergy doesn’t affect azithromycin use; they’re unrelated structurally. This doesn’t require reporting, as no cross-reaction occurs here.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Remeasuring confirms the 190/110 mm Hg reading, ensuring accuracy in kidney failure, where hypertension is common. It’s the first step before acting.
Choice B reason: Administering medication without verification risks error; BP may be inaccurate. In kidney failure, precise BP guides therapy, so this waits.
Choice C reason: Reporting to the charge nurse follows confirmation; unverified readings waste time. Accuracy in chronic kidney failure is critical before escalating.
Choice D reason: Bed rest may help, but confirming BP first prioritizes data. Kidney failure needs validated hypertension readings to direct immediate care safely.
Correct Answer is D
Explanation
Choice A reason: Music therapy reduces pain perception but doesn’t eliminate breakthrough pain needs. Scientifically, it’s an adjunct, not a replacement, for analgesics, as severe pain signals persist despite auditory distraction, indicating misunderstanding of its supplementary role in hospice care.
Choice B reason: Discontinuing music when unresponsive overlooks its passive benefits, like comfort, even in unconscious states. Scientifically, auditory stimuli can soothe, suggesting continued use, not cessation, misaligning with hospice goals for holistic pain management.
Choice C reason: Increasing alertness contradicts music therapy’s calming effect in hospice, aimed at relaxation, not stimulation. Scientifically, it lowers arousal to ease pain perception, not heighten awareness, showing a misgrasp of its palliative intent.
Choice D reason: Music distracts from pain by engaging the brain’s auditory cortex, reducing focus on nociceptive signals. Scientifically, this aligns with gate control theory, where non-painful stimuli mitigate pain perception, reflecting accurate understanding of its role in hospice care.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
