A client with gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD), who has been self-medicating with famotidine for the past week, is admitted to the acute care center because the symptoms have worsened. The nurse should anticipate which treatment?
Insertion of a small bore tube for continuous enteral feedings.
Intravenous administration of a proton pump inhibitor.
Total parenteral nutrition administration via a central catheter.
Insertion of a nasogastric tube to low intermittent suction.
The Correct Answer is B
Choice A reason: Inserting a small bore tube for enteral feedings is inappropriate for acute GERD exacerbation, as feeding increases gastric volume, worsening reflux by raising pressure and acid exposure. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reduce acid production, alleviating mucosal irritation, addressing GERD’s pathophysiology more effectively than nutritional interventions.
Choice B reason: Intravenous PPIs (e.g., pantoprazole) are standard for severe GERD, inhibiting H+/K+-ATPase in parietal cells, reducing acid secretion. This promotes esophageal healing when oral famotidine fails. IV delivery ensures rapid onset, critical for controlling worsening symptoms, preventing complications like esophagitis or Barrett’s esophagus in acute settings.
Choice C reason: Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) bypasses the gut, used for conditions like bowel obstruction, not GERD, which involves acid reflux from sphincter dysfunction. TPN does not address acid production. PPIs target the pathophysiological cause, reducing esophageal acid exposure, making TPN irrelevant for GERD management.
Choice D reason: A nasogastric tube with suction removes gastric contents but does not treat GERD’s acid reflux, caused by lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction. It risks aspiration and is temporary. PPIs effectively reduce acid, preventing esophageal damage, making them the preferred treatment for severe GERD exacerbation.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A reason: Using a heating pad is contraindicated in Raynaud’s, as reduced sensation from vasospasm risks burns. Raynaud’s involves cold-triggered arteriolar constriction, reducing blood flow. Heat does not address vasospasm’s pathophysiology and may cause tissue damage, making this instruction inappropriate compared to cold protection strategies.
Choice B reason: Wearing gloves when handling cold items prevents vasospasm in Raynaud’s, where cold triggers arteriolar constriction, causing ischemia and pain. Protecting extremities maintains blood flow, preventing episodes. This directly addresses the disease’s pathophysiological trigger, making it the most effective instruction for managing Raynaud’s symptoms.
Choice C reason: Knee-high support stockings improve venous return, relevant for venous insufficiency, not Raynaud’s arterial vasospasm. Stockings do not prevent cold-induced vasoconstriction, the primary trigger. Gloves for cold exposure directly mitigate vasospastic episodes, making this instruction less effective for Raynaud’s disease management.
Choice D reason: Regular walking improves overall circulation but does not prevent Raynaud’s vasospastic episodes, triggered by cold or stress. While exercise supports vascular health, avoiding cold exposure with gloves is more targeted, directly reducing arteriolar constriction and ischemic symptoms, making walking a secondary recommendation.
Correct Answer is B
Explanation
Choice A reason: Connecting to suction is inappropriate, as “coffee ground” drainage indicates upper GI bleeding, likely from an ulcer. Suction could worsen bleeding by traumatizing the site. Clamping and notifying the provider ensure assessment, preventing further hemorrhage or complications like perforation in this critical scenario.
Choice B reason: “Coffee ground” drainage suggests oxidized blood from upper GI bleeding (e.g., gastritis). Clamping prevents irritation or bleeding exacerbation, and contacting the provider ensures urgent evaluation, possibly via endoscopy or proton pump inhibitors, addressing the bleeding source to stabilize the client and prevent shock.
Choice C reason: Removing and reinserting the tube risks further trauma to the bleeding site, as “coffee ground” drainage indicates active hemorrhage. Repeated insertion may dislodge clots, worsening bleeding. Clamping and notifying the provider prioritize safety, allowing diagnostic and therapeutic interventions for the underlying cause.
Choice D reason: High continuous suction is contraindicated, as “coffee ground” drainage signals GI bleeding, and aggressive suction could dislodge clots, increasing hemorrhage. Clamping and contacting the provider ensure controlled management, preventing complications like hypovolemic shock, making this action harmful and inappropriate.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.
