A client receives a prescription for penicillin 1.2 million units IM. The available vial is labeled, “600,000 units/mL.” How many mL should the nurse administer? (Enter numeric value only.)

Choice A reason:

Requesting a prescription to change the route of administration and use the available heparin is not appropriate. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) are not interchangeable on a unit-for-unit basis. They have different pharmacokinetics and dosing requirements. Changing the route without proper guidance can lead to incorrect dosing and potential complications.

Choice B reason:

Calculating and administering the equivalent dose of the available low molecular weight heparin is incorrect. LMWH and UFH have different dosing protocols and are not directly interchangeable. Administering LMWH instead of UFH without proper conversion and guidance can result in inappropriate anticoagulation.

Choice C reason:

Diluting the available heparin in 250 ml of normal saline solution prior to IV administration is not appropriate. The prescription specifies heparin 5000 units IV STAT, which indicates an immediate need for intravenous administration. Diluting and administering it in this manner does not align with the urgency of the order.

Choice D reason:

Advising the pharmacy of the need to deliver a vial of heparin to the nursing unit immediately is the correct action. This ensures that the client receives the prescribed medication in the correct form and dosage as ordered by the healthcare provider. It is crucial to follow the specific instructions for heparin administration to ensure patient safety and effective anticoagulation.

Choice A Reason:

Depression screening is important for overall health and well-being, especially in weight management programs where mental health can significantly impact outcomes. However, it is not the primary measure for determining the effectiveness of orlistat. Orlistat works by inhibiting the absorption of fats from the diet, leading to weight loss. Therefore, while mental health monitoring is crucial, it does not directly measure the medication’s effectiveness.

Choice B Reason:

Daily calorie count is a useful tool in weight management programs to ensure that clients are adhering to a calorie-restricted diet. However, it is not a direct measure of the effectiveness of orlistat. While calorie counting can help manage weight, the primary goal of orlistat is to reduce fat absorption, which is better reflected in changes in body weight and BMI.

Choice C Reason:

Body mass index (BMI) is a key indicator of weight management and is directly related to the effectiveness of orlistat. BMI is calculated based on height and weight, providing a clear measure of changes in body weight over time. Monitoring BMI helps determine if the client is losing weight as expected, making it the most appropriate assessment for evaluating the effectiveness of orlistat.

Choice D Reason:

Serum protein levels are important for assessing nutritional status and overall health. However, they do not directly measure the effectiveness of orlistat in a weight management program. Orlistat’s primary function is to reduce fat absorption, and its effectiveness is better assessed through changes in body weight and BMI rather than serum protein levels.