A client is using an incentive spirometer on the first postoperative day after an inguinal herniorrhaphy. The practical nurse (PN) should reteach the proper use of the spirometer when the client demonstrates which action.

The PN should double-check the following with a second nurse:

• The dose of insulin drawn up in the syringe: Double-checking the dose of insulin is essential to ensure the correct amount is being administered to the client.
• The insulin vial for color and clarity: Insulin should be clear and free of particles or discoloration. Checking the vial for any abnormalities ensures the integrity and quality of the insulin.
• The expiration date on the insulin vial: Insulin should not be used beyond its expiration date. Verifying the expiration date helps ensure that the insulin is still effective and safe for administration.
• The insulin concentration: Different concentrations of insulin are available, such as

U-100 and U-500. Double-checking the concentration ensures that the correct type of insulin is being administered.

It's important to note that the other options listed are not necessary for double-checking with a second nurse in this context:

• The sliding scale insulin lispro order: Sliding scale insulin is typically used to adjust insulin doses based on blood glucose levels. However, in this case, the given dose of 2 units of insulin lispro may be a specific prescription for the client's diabetes management and not related to the acute appendicitis.
• The type of insulin to be administered: The type of insulin, in this case, is specified as insulin lispro. Confirming the type of insulin is important, but it is not a part of the double-checking process since it is already specified.
• The history and physical with the diabetes diagnosis listed: The client's medical history and diabetes diagnosis are important aspects of their overall care but are not directly related to double-checking the administration of insulin.
• The site for insulin administration: The specific site for insulin administration may depend on the client's individual preference or medical condition, but it is not a part of the double-check process. The double-check is primarily focused on the accuracy of the medication itself.

This statement suggests that the client has found sources of emotional support and is relying on them to cope with the challenges posed by his prognosis. Acceptance of a prognosis often involves coming to terms with the reality of the situation and finding ways to manage the emotional and practical aspects of it. By acknowledging the support he has received from his faith and family, the client demonstrates a willingness to lean on these resources for strength and comfort.
The other statements do not necessarily reflect acceptance of the prognosis:

A. "I think I had this disease for a long time, but the doctor did not find it." This statement implies a sense of disbelief or frustration with the delay in diagnosing the disease, rather than acceptance of the prognosis itself.
C. "I understand this is a disease that occurs mostly in older men." While this statement shows some awareness of the disease, it does not necessarily indicate acceptance. It may simply reflect an understanding of the demographics of prostate cancer without addressing the client's personal feelings or coping mechanisms.
D. "I do not have any use for those who say this disease is going to win." This statement may indicate resistance or defiance towards the negative outlook associated with the disease. It suggests a desire to maintain a positive attitude but does not necessarily reflect a full acceptance of the prognosis and its implications.