When assessing patients at a mental health clinic, how should their current level of overall functioning be judged?
A continuum from mentally healthy to mentally unhealthy
The rate of both their intellectual and emotional growth
The degree of conformity of the individual to society’s norms
The degree to which an individual appears logical and rational
The Correct Answer is A
Choice A reason: Assessing functioning on a continuum reflects the spectrum of mental health, from optimal to severe impairment. Tools like the Global Assessment of Functioning scale quantify symptom severity and social/occupational performance, integrating neurobiological factors like dopamine imbalances in schizophrenia or serotonin deficits in depression, providing a comprehensive evaluation of mental health status.
Choice B reason: Focusing on intellectual and emotional growth is irrelevant for current functioning. Mental disorders like anxiety or psychosis primarily disrupt mood and cognition, not developmental growth. Neurobiological changes, such as reduced prefrontal cortex activity in depression, affect daily performance, not growth rates, making this metric unsuitable for assessing overall mental health functioning.
Choice C reason: Judging by societal conformity ignores individual neurobiological differences. Mental illnesses, like bipolar disorder, involve altered brain activity (e.g., heightened amygdala response), not just nonconformity. This approach risks mislabeling cultural or personality variations as pathology, disregarding scientific evidence of brain-based dysfunction and hindering accurate assessment of mental health status.
Choice D reason: Assessing logical and rational appearance is insufficient, as disorders like schizophrenia can present with intact logic but severe delusions due to dopamine dysregulation. This overlooks emotional and social impairments, critical in mental health assessment, and fails to capture the full spectrum of neurobiological and functional deficits present in psychiatric conditions.
Nursing Test Bank
Naxlex Comprehensive Predictor Exams
Related Questions
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Interventions, like offering snacks, address identified problems (e.g., forgetting to eat) to meet nutritional needs. This action targets physiological deficits, potentially linked to cognitive impairments from low acetylcholine in dementia, ensuring adequate caloric intake to support brain function and overall health in the care plan.
Choice B reason: Planning/goals outline desired outcomes, not specific actions. Forgetting to eat, possibly due to frontal lobe dysfunction, requires goals like “maintain adequate nutrition.” Interventions, not goals, specify actions like offering snacks, making this section incorrect for the statement’s placement in the care plan.
Choice C reason: Assessment involves data collection, like observing eating patterns, not actions like offering snacks. Forgetting to eat may reflect cognitive deficits, but assessment identifies the problem, not solutions. This section precedes interventions, making it an incorrect location for the described statement.
Choice D reason: Diagnosis identifies problems, like “impaired nutrition” due to cognitive deficits, not specific actions. Offering snacks is an intervention to address the diagnosis, not the diagnosis itself. This section is incorrect for the statement, which belongs in the intervention phase of the care plan.
Correct Answer is A
Explanation
Choice A reason: Blocking norepinephrine at alpha-1 receptors inhibits vasoconstriction, reducing vascular tone. This disrupts baroreceptor-mediated blood pressure regulation, causing orthostatic hypotension when standing. The autonomic nervous system fails to compensate for positional changes, leading to dizziness and fainting, a common side effect of alpha-1 blockers like prazosin.
Choice B reason: Increased psychotic symptoms are linked to dopamine dysregulation, not alpha-1 receptor blockade. Norepinephrine blockade affects autonomic functions, not psychosis, which involves mesolimbic dopamine hyperactivity. This side effect is unrelated to alpha-1 receptors, making this option scientifically inaccurate for the described mechanism.
Choice C reason: Appetite disturbance is typically associated with serotonin or histamine receptor effects, not alpha-1 norepinephrine blockade. Norepinephrine at alpha-1 receptors regulates vascular tone, not appetite control, which involves hypothalamic signaling. This side effect is not a direct consequence of alpha-1 blockade, rendering this option incorrect.
Choice D reason: Hypertensive crisis results from excessive norepinephrine activity, often due to monoamine oxidase inhibitors, not alpha-1 receptor blockade. Blocking alpha-1 receptors causes vasodilation, lowering blood pressure, not raising it. This makes hypertensive crisis an unlikely side effect, contrary to the pharmacological mechanism of alpha-1 blockers.
Whether you are a student looking to ace your exams or a practicing nurse seeking to enhance your expertise , our nursing education contents will empower you with the confidence and competence to make a difference in the lives of patients and become a respected leader in the healthcare field.
Visit Naxlex, invest in your future and unlock endless possibilities with our unparalleled nursing education contents today
Report Wrong Answer on the Current Question
Do you disagree with the answer? If yes, what is your expected answer? Explain.
Kindly be descriptive with the issue you are facing.