The primary nurse asks another nurse to assist in checking a client for an apical-radial pulse deficit. One nurse counts an apical pulse of 72 beats/minute while the other nurse counts a radial pulse of 88 beats/minute. Which action should the primary nurse take?

Choice A Reason:
Checking the reading after the other nurse leaves the room is inappropriate. This option suggests waiting until the other nurse leaves to check the reading again. However, there's no guarantee that the discrepancy will resolve itself, and waiting might delay necessary intervention if there is indeed a pulse deficit. Therefore, this option does not address the immediate need for clarification.
Choice B Reason:
Documenting a pulse deficit of 16 beats per minute is inappropriate. While there appears to be a difference between the apical and radial pulse readings, it's important to verify the accuracy of the measurements before documenting a pulse deficit. Documenting without confirmation could lead to inaccurate information in the patient's medical record.
Choice C Reason:
Reporting the results to the healthcare provider without confirming the accuracy of the measurements may lead to unnecessary concern or intervention. It's essential to ensure that the findings are accurate before reporting them to the healthcare provider.
Choice D Reason:
Repeating the assessment to obtain another reading is appropriate. This option prioritizes patient safety by acknowledging the need to confirm the accuracy of the measurements. Repeating the assessment allows the nurses to ensure consistency and reliability in their findings before taking further action or reporting to the healthcare provider.

Choice A Reason:
Audible thud without pain is incorrect. An audible thud without pain would not be an expected response when percussing the costovertebral angle (CVA) in a client with pyelonephritis. Pyelonephritis typically presents with tenderness upon percussion of the CVA due to inflammation or infection of the kidneys. The absence of pain in this scenario would not be consistent with the expected response.
Choice B Reason:
Rigidity and firmness are incorrect. Rigidity and firmness upon percussion of the costovertebral angle (CVA) may suggest muscle tension or guarding, rather than the tenderness typically associated with kidney inflammation or infection such as pyelonephritis. While guarding can occur in response to pain, it is not the expected response when assessing for kidney tenderness.
Choice C Reason:
Rebound tenderness is incorrect. Rebound tenderness refers to the exacerbation of pain upon release of pressure, typically observed in conditions such as peritonitis. While rebound tenderness may be present in some abdominal conditions, it is not the expected response when percussing the costovertebral angle (CVA) to assess for kidney tenderness in pyelonephritis. In pyelonephritis, tenderness upon initial percussion is more indicative of the condition.
Choice D Reason:
Sharp, severe pain is correct. Sharp, severe pain upon percussing the CVA suggests tenderness, which can be indicative of kidney inflammation or infection, such as pyelonephritis. This finding would support the diagnosis and help guide further assessment and treatment.