In reading a client's record, the nurse notes that the client is experiencing tinnitus. Which assessment provides the nurse with the information needed to evaluate the effects of this condition?

Choice A Reason:
Covering the inflamed area and notify the healthcare provider suggests taking precautions to protect the inflamed area and promptly informing the healthcare provider. While it's important to notify the healthcare provider about any concerning findings, covering the area without further assessment may prevent the nurse from gathering additional information that could be helpful in determining the cause of the lymph node enlargement.
Choice B Reason:
Auscultating the lymph node for the presence of a bruit involves listening for abnormal sounds (bruits) over the lymph node, which could indicate underlying vascular abnormalities. While it's important to assess lymph nodes for abnormalities, such as tenderness or enlargement, auscultation for bruits is not a standard assessment technique for lymph nodes.
Choice C Reason:
Asking the client about any localized tenderness at the site involves directly gathering information from the client about their experience of tenderness at the site of the enlarged lymph node. This information can provide valuable clues about the nature of the lymph node enlargement, such as whether it is inflamed due to infection or inflammation.
Choice D Reason:
Recording this normal finding in the assessment record assumes that the nurse considers the enlarged and visible lymph node as a normal finding. However, enlarged and visible lymph nodes are not typically considered normal and may indicate an underlying health issue that requires further assessment and intervention.

Choice A Reason:
Pupils equal, round, reacts to light, and accommodation (PERLA) is inappropriate. While PERLA includes accommodation, which involves constriction of the pupils when focusing on a near object, accommodation was not specifically assessed or mentioned in the scenario. Therefore, it would be inaccurate to include it in the documentation based solely on the information provided.
Choice B Reason:
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 15 is inappropriate. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) assesses the level of consciousness based on eye, verbal, and motor responses. However, the scenario does not provide information about the client's verbal or motor responses, so using the GCS score of 15 would not accurately reflect the findings described in the assessment of the pupils.
Choice C Reason:
Pupils equal, round, reacts to light (PERRL) is appropriate. This notation describes the key observations made during the assessment of the client's pupils. "PERRL" stands for Pupils Equal, Round, and Reactive to Light. In the given scenario, both pupils are equal in size, round, and demonstrate a brisk response to light, indicating normal pupillary function.
Choice D Reason:
Neurological status intact is inappropriate. While the assessment findings suggest normal pupillary function, documenting "neurological status intact" is a broader statement that encompasses various aspects of neurological function beyond just pupillary assessment. It may be accurate to describe the pupillary findings within the context of a broader neurological assessment, but it does not specifically address the pupil findings as described in the scenario. Therefore, option C is the most appropriate notation for documenting the assessment findings of the pupils.