The nurse observes an older adult client walking aimlessly in the hallway and staring straight ahead with a blank expression. How should the nurse enter documentation of this finding in the client's electronic medical record (EMR)?

Choice A Reason:
Reviewing the client's serum electrolytes is incorrect. While abnormalities in electrolyte levels can sometimes contribute to neurological symptoms, such as paresthesia, reviewing the client's serum electrolytes may not directly identify additional findings consistent with the client's reported paresthesia of the hands and legs. Therefore, this option is less relevant for assessing paresthesia and identifying additional consistent findings.
Choice B Reason:
This is the correct action to identify additional findings consistent with the client's paresthesia. Paresthesia, or abnormal sensations like burning or tingling, may indicate neurological dysfunction. Assessing the client's muscle strength and hand grips can provide valuable information about neurological function and help identify any weakness or changes that may be associated with the paresthesia.
Choice C Reason:
Checking distal phalanges capillary refill is incorrect. Checking distal phalanges capillary refill is important for assessing peripheral circulation, but it may not directly identify additional findings consistent with paresthesia. While impaired circulation could contribute to sensory disturbances, such as paresthesia, it is not always the primary cause. Therefore, this option may not fully capture the sensory aspect of the client's reported symptoms.
Choice D Reason:
While observing the skin for signs of inflammation or irritation is important in assessing for other conditions, such as infection or inflammation, it is not directly related to identifying additional findings consistent with paresthesia. Paresthesia primarily involves abnormal sensations and neurological function rather than changes in the skin.

Choice A Reason:
Hyperactive bowel sounds are incorrect. Hyperactive bowel sounds refer to increased or loud gurgling noises heard during auscultation of the abdomen, which may indicate increased intestinal motility or bowel obstruction. These sounds are typically high-pitched and occur in various abdominal quadrants, rather than specifically in the upper midline area.
Choice B Reason:
A minor variation is incorrect. A minor variation in abdominal sounds may occur and could be considered normal. However, a low-pitched blowing sound in the upper midline area is not typically categorized as a minor variation but rather as an abnormal finding that warrants further investigation.
Choice C Reason:
Normal borborygmic sounds is incorrect. Borborygmic refers to the normal rumbling or gurgling sounds produced by the movement of gas and fluid in the intestines. While borborygmic sounds may be heard during abdominal auscultation, they are typically described as high-pitched and occur in various abdominal quadrants, not specifically in the upper midline area. Therefore, they are not likely to be the indication of the finding described in the scenario.
Choice D Reason:
Possible renal artery stenosis is correct. Renal artery stenosis is a condition characterized by the narrowing of one or both renal arteries, which can lead to reduced blood flow to the kidneys. When auscultating the abdomen, a low-pitched blowing sound (bruit) heard over the upper midline area could indicate turbulence of blood flow in the renal arteries. This bruit is typically associated with renal artery stenosis and reflects the increased velocity of blood passing through a narrowed arterial lumen. Identifying a renal artery bruit during abdominal auscultation warrants further investigation, such as imaging studies or referral to a specialist for evaluation and management of renal artery stenosis.