The nurse observes an older adult client walking aimlessly in the hallway and staring straight ahead with a blank expression. How should the nurse enter documentation of this finding in the client's electronic medical record (EMR)?

Choice A Reason:
Reporting the client's abnormal lung sounds to the healthcare provider is inappropriate. This option is not appropriate because vesicular breath sounds are actually normal lung sounds. They are soft, low-pitched sounds heard predominantly during inspiration in the peripheral lung fields. Reporting them as abnormal would be incorrect and could potentially lead to unnecessary concern or intervention.
Choice B Reason:
Continuing with the remainder of the client's physical assessment is appropriate. Vesicular breath sounds in the bases of both lungs posteriorly are normal findings. They indicate adequate ventilation and airflow in the lower lung fields. Therefore, there is no need for immediate intervention or further assessment specific to this finding. Continuing with the remainder of the physical assessment is appropriate to assess other aspects of the client's health.
Choice C Reason:
Asking the client to cough and then auscultate at the site again is inappropriate. Asking the client to cough and then auscultate again is not necessary in response to hearing vesicular breath sounds. Vesicular breath sounds are normal lung sounds and do not require further assessment or intervention. Coughing would not change the character of vesicular breath sounds.
Choice D Reason:
Measuring the client's oxygen saturation with a pulse oximeter is inappropriate. While measuring oxygen saturation with a pulse oximeter is an important assessment, it is not specifically indicated in response to hearing vesicular breath sounds. Vesicular breath sounds indicate normal ventilation and airflow in the lower lung fields, but they do not provide direct information about oxygenation status. Oxygen saturation should be assessed as part of a comprehensive respiratory assessment, but it does not need to be prioritized solely based on the finding of vesicular breath sounds.

Choice A Reason:
Testing feet for a positive Babinski reflex is wrong. The Babinski reflex is a neurological test that assesses upper motor neuron function, particularly in the lower extremities. However, it is not relevant to assessing cold feet, and testing for the Babinski reflex would not provide useful information in this situation.
Choice B Reason:
Observing color of the feet and toes is wright. Observing the color of the feet and toes can provide important information about circulation. Pallor, cyanosis, or mottling may indicate inadequate blood flow or perfusion to the extremities, which could contribute to cold feet.
Choice C Reason:
Measuring skin elasticity around the ankles is wrong. Skin elasticity assessment is more relevant for evaluating hydration status or tissue turgor. While it may be useful in certain contexts, it is not directly related to assessing cold feet and peripheral circulation. Therefore, it is not necessary before covering the client's feet in this scenario.
Choice D Reason:
Assessing volume of the pedal pulses is wright. Assessing the volume of the pedal pulses (such as dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulses) provides information about peripheral vascular status. Weak or absent pulses may indicate compromised circulation, contributing to cold feet.
Choice E Reason:
Palpating dorsal surface of feet for warmth is wright. palpating the dorsal surface of the feet for warmth helps assess peripheral perfusion. Coolness to touch may indicate decreased blood flow to the extremities, while warmth suggests adequate circulation.