A client who is admitted for an acute stroke reports the onset of a burning sensation in the hands and legs. Which action should the nurse implement to identify additional findings that are consistent with the client's paresthesia?

Choice A Reason:
Asking the client to recall what was consumed for lunch and breakfast is appropriate. Asking the client to recall recent events, such as what was consumed for lunch and breakfast, helps assess their short-term memory. Difficulty recalling recent events or recent medication doses may indicate emery impairment or cognitive decline, which could be contributing to the reported confusion and forgetfulness. This assessment provides valuable information about the client's ability to retain and recall recent information, which is pertinent to understanding the extent of memory impairment.
Choice B Reason:
Asking the spouse how often the pain medication is to be taken is inappropriate. While asking the spouse about the pain medication regimen provides information about the client's medication schedule, it does not directly assess the client's memory. Additionally, relying solely on the spouse's report may not accurately reflect the client's memory abilities or recall of medication instructions.
Choice C Reason:
Request for the spouse to write down the things the client forgets is inappropriate. Asking the spouse to write down forgotten items may help track memory lapses but does not directly assess the client's memory during the home visit. It also does not provide real-time information about the client's ability to recall recent events or medication instructions.
Choice D Reason:
Observing client ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) is inappropriate. Assessing the client's ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) is important for evaluating overall functional status but may not specifically target memory assessment. While memory impairment can impact ADL performance, it is not the most direct assessment for evaluating memory specifically during the home visit.

Choice A Reason:
Sending the sample for laboratory evaluation is incorrect. Sending the urine sample for laboratory evaluation is a standard procedure to assess for any abnormalities, such as urinary tract infections (UTIs), kidney function, or other urinary tract disorders. While laboratory evaluation of the urine sample is important for diagnostic purposes, the client's difficulty providing an adequate urine sample suggests an underlying issue that needs to be addressed before obtaining a sample.
Choice B Reason:
Giving the client 8 ounces (236.5 mL) of water to drink is incorrect. Offering the client water to drink is a common intervention to encourage urine production and facilitate urine sample collection, particularly if the client is dehydrated or has difficulty producing a sample. However, given the client's symptoms of lower abdominal discomfort, frequent urination, and difficulty providing a urine sample despite efforts, simply offering water may not adequately address the underlying issue of potential bladder distention.
Choice C Reason:
Evaluating the client for bladder distention is correct. The client's symptoms of lower abdominal discomfort, frequent urination, and difficulty providing a urine sample after an extended period of time, along with returning with only a few drops of urine, are suggestive of potential bladder distention. Evaluating the client for bladder distention involves assessing for signs such as a visibly enlarged and palpable bladder, suprapubic discomfort or pain, and percussion of the bladder to assess for dullness, indicating fluid accumulation. Addressing bladder distention is essential to ensure the client's comfort and prevent complications associated with urinary retention.
Choice D Reason:
Instructing the client to attempt to urinate again is incorrect. Instructing the client to attempt to urinate again may be a reasonable intervention if the bladder is not distended and the client is simply having difficulty producing a urine sample. However, given the client's symptoms and the difficulty providing an adequate urine sample despite previous attempts, simply instructing the client to try again may not address the underlying issue of potential bladder distention. Evaluating for bladder distention is necessary to determine the appropriate course of action and ensure the client's comfort and safety.