A nurse in a mental health facility is planning care for a client who has obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and is newly admitted to the unit.
Which of the following actions should the mental health nurse plan to take regarding the client's compulsive behaviors?

Rationale for Choice A:

Pacing can be a physical manifestation of anxiety. It allows individuals to release some of the nervous energy that builds up during anxious moments. Restricting this behavior can potentially escalate anxiety.

Walking with the client can provide a sense of safety and support. It demonstrates to the client that they are not alone in their anxiety and that the nurse is there to help them.

Gradually slowing the pace of the walk can help to regulate the client's breathing and heart rate. This can have a calming effect on both the body and mind.

Walking can also be a form of distraction. It can help to take the client's mind off of their worries and focus on the present moment.

Walking can help to release endorphins, which have mood-boosting effects. This can help to counteract some of the negative emotions associated with anxiety.

Rationale for Choice B:

Escorting the client to their room may be perceived as restrictive and controlling. This could potentially increase the client's anxiety.

Removing the client from the public area of the unit may isolate them from other people and activities. This could make them feel more alone and anxious.

Rationale for Choice C:

Allowing the client to pace alone may not be safe. The client could potentially become agitated or injure themselves.

Pacing alone does not provide the client with any support or guidance. This could make it more difficult for them to manage their anxiety.

Rationale for Choice D:

Instructing the client to sit down and stop pacing may be perceived as dismissive and unhelpful. It does not address the underlying causes of the client's anxiety.

Forcing the client to stop pacing could potentially escalate their anxiety. This could lead to agitation, aggression, or other negative behaviors.

Choice A: Lock the doors to the unit and secure windows so they cannot be opened: While removing potential means of self-harm from the environment is a safety precaution, it is not the most immediate or effective intervention for a client actively experiencing suicidal ideation who has refused a safety contract. Locking doors and windows may increase anxiety and feelings of entrapment, potentially exacerbating the client's distress and hindering open communication. Additionally, it may not address underlying emotional and psychological factors contributing to the suicidal thoughts.

Choice B: Remove any objects from the client's environment that could be used for self-harm: Similar to Choice A, removing potential means can be a helpful safety measure but should not be the primary intervention in this situation. It is important to recognize that clients can find alternative means if they are determined to self-harm, and focusing solely on environmental control can detract from addressing the root of the suicidal crisis.

Choice C: Assign a staff member to stay with the client at times: This option prioritizes the client's safety and emotional well-being by providing constant support and supervision. A dedicated staff member can:

Monitor the client's behavior and emotional state closely, potentially identifying early warning signs of impending self-harm.

Provide open and non-judgmental support, allowing the client to express their thoughts and feelings freely without fear of being alone with their distress.

Engage in therapeutic communication, helping the client explore alternative coping mechanisms and develop safety plans for managing suicidal urges.

Alert other healthcare professionals if the client's condition deteriorates or if there is any immediate risk of self- harm.

Offer a sense of security and reassurance, knowing someone is constantly available to listen and intervene if needed.

Choice D: Provide the client with plastic eating utensils for meals: While this precaution may reduce the risk of self- harm at mealtimes, it addresses a very specific concern and does not address the broader issue of the client's suicidal ideation. It is also important to consider that plastic utensils may not be effective in preventing self-harm if the client is determined and resourceful.

Therefore, assigning a staff member to stay with the client at all times is the most appropriate and immediate action to prioritize the client's safety and emotional well-being in this situation. This approach fosters open communication, provides continuous support, and allows for early intervention if necessary. While environmental controls and risk assessments can be valuable complementary strategies, they should not overshadow the importance of close human connection and emotional support in crisis situations.