In what area is an "ophthalmic use only" medication administered?

Choice A reason: Sim’s position, lateral, suits rectal meds, not oral intake. Fowler’s upright stance aids swallowing safely. This choice errors as it’s impractical for oral administration. Nursing standards universally recognize this distinction, ensuring patient comfort and reducing aspiration risk distinctly.

Choice B reason: Supine, lying flat, increases aspiration risk for oral meds. Fowler’s position prevents choking effectively. This choice is unsafe per nursing pharmacology standards. It’s universally distinct as a poor option for swallowing, lacking the safety Fowler’s provides.

Choice C reason: Prone, face-down, obstructs oral med swallowing entirely. Fowler’s ensures safe administration comfortably. This choice misaligns with nursing standards for oral intake. It’s universally distinct as ineffective, posing risks to patient safety and medication delivery.

Choice D reason: Fowler’s, semi-upright, supports safe oral med swallowing, minimizing aspiration. It’s the standard per nursing pharmacology guidelines. This position is universally applied, distinctly effective for ensuring medication reaches the stomach without complications.

Choice A reason: Water isn’t an electrolyte; diuretics primarily deplete potassium levels. This misidentifies the focus, per nursing pharmacology. It’s a universal error, distinctly irrelevant to electrolyte monitoring in diuretic therapy.

Choice B reason: Diuretics like furosemide often cause potassium loss, risking arrhythmias. Monitoring is critical, per nursing standards. It’s universally recognized, distinctly essential for safe management of diuretic effects.

Choice C reason: Magnesium can shift, but potassium is the primary concern with diuretics. This is secondary, per nursing pharmacology. It’s universally distinct, less critical than potassium in routine monitoring.

Choice D reason: Calcium isn’t typically depleted by diuretics; potassium is key. This errors in priority, per nursing standards. It’s universally distinct, missing the main electrolyte risk in diuretic use.