A patient has been diagnosed with septic shock.
What collaborative interventions would be expected? (Select all that apply)

Choice A rationale:

It is crucial for the nurse to prioritize patient safety and adhere to professional guidelines when encountering a potential diversion of controlled substances. Informing the charge nurse is the most appropriate initial action for several reasons:

Chain of Command: The charge nurse holds a supervisory position and is responsible for addressing issues within the unit, including concerns about medication diversion. Reporting suspicions to the charge nurse ensures adherence to the established chain of command and facilitates a prompt, organized response.

Confidentiality and Objectivity: The charge nurse is trained to handle sensitive situations discreetly and objectively. They can initiate a thorough investigation while maintaining confidentiality and protecting the rights of all involved parties.

Access to Resources: The charge nurse has access to resources and authority to take immediate action, such as securing medications, initiating patient assessments, and notifying appropriate personnel within the healthcare facility.

Collaboration and Support: The charge nurse can provide guidance and support to the reporting nurse, ensuring their concerns are addressed appropriately and that they feel safe in coming forward with their suspicions.

Rationale for other choices:

B. Reporting the incident directly to the hospital’s security department might be premature without first informing the charge nurse. The charge nurse can assess the situation, gather more information, and determine the most appropriate course of action, which may or may not involve security at this initial stage.

C. Requesting assistive personnel (AP) to monitor the other nurse’s actions is inappropriate. It places a burden on APs who are not trained or authorized to investigate such matters. It could also compromise the integrity of the investigation and potentially jeopardize patient safety.

D. Confronting the other nurse directly is not recommended. It could escalate the situation, create a hostile work environment, and potentially compromise the investigation. It is essential to follow established protocols and involve appropriate personnel to ensure a fair and thorough investigation.

Choice A rationale:

Incorrect. Patients have a legal right to access their medical records under the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Denying access is a violation of patient rights and could lead to legal consequences.

Undermines patient autonomy and trust. Patients have a right to know what information is in their medical records and to participate in their own healthcare decisions. Denying access can erode trust in the healthcare system.

Potential for errors and misunderstandings. If patients cannot review their records, they may not be able to identify errors or misunderstandings that could impact their care.

Choice B rationale:

Correct. This response upholds patient rights while ensuring that the request for access is documented and handled appropriately.

Protects patient privacy and confidentiality. The written request process helps to ensure that only the patient or their authorized representative has access to the records.

Provides a mechanism for tracking and auditing access requests. This can help to prevent unauthorized access and ensure compliance with HIPAA regulations.

Choice C rationale:

Incorrect. Patients have a right to access their records at any time, not just when they are being discharged.

Delays access to information. Patients may need to review their records to make informed decisions about their care, even if they are not being discharged.

Potential for records to be lost or misplaced. There is a risk that records could be lost or misplaced if they are not provided to the patient until discharge.

Choice D rationale:

Incorrect. Patients do not need to provide a reason for wanting to access their medical records.

Intrusive and unnecessary. Patients may feel uncomfortable or embarrassed about having to explain their reasons for wanting to access their records.

Potential for discrimination. Patients may be less likely to request access to their records if they feel that they will be judged or questioned about their reasons for doing so.