A nurse on a quality improvement team is implementing a plan to decrease the rate of pressure injuries in a long-term care facility. Which of the following actions should the team take to evaluate the effectiveness of the plan?

Choice A rationale:

Leaving the medication on the client's bedside table is not appropriate because it doesn't address the client's concerns and may result in the client not taking the medication at all. This choice does not promote the client's well-being.

Choice B rationale:

Returning in 1 hour to administer the medication doesn't address the client's immediate concerns and also doesn't provide adequate information about the medication's importance. Delaying the medication administration without proper communication is not ideal.

Choice C rationale:

Mixing the medication in applesauce may be appropriate in some cases, but it doesn't address the client's reluctance to take the medication due to fatigue. Additionally, the client's Crohn's disease might require specific instructions for medication administration that should not be altered without consulting the healthcare provider.

Choice D rationale:

The correct answer. Informing the client of the consequences of refusing the medication is the most appropriate action. The nurse should engage in a therapeutic conversation with the client, explaining the importance of the medication in managing Crohn's disease symptoms and preventing complications. This choice respects the client's autonomy while providing necessary information for an informed decision.

The correct answer is Choice D: Review the client's request with the family.

Choice D rationale: Reviewing the client's request with the family respects the client's autonomy and the directives stated in their living will. It allows the nurse to communicate and clarify the client's wishes with the family, helping them understand the decisions made by the client when they were competent. This action promotes open communication and may facilitate resolution of the conflict.

Choice A rationale: Inserting the tube and beginning feedings per the family's request disregards the client's living will, which explicitly declines the use of artificial enteral nutrition as a life-sustaining measure. This action goes against the ethical principle of autonomy and could have legal implications.

Choice B rationale: While asking the provider to discuss the issue with the family could be a subsequent step, it is not the primary action to take in this situation. The nurse should first review the client's request with the family to emphasize the importance of the living will and facilitate understanding between the parties involved.

Choice C rationale: Reporting the dilemma to the facility's dietitian does not address the ethical and legal concerns at hand. The dietitian's role is to manage nutritional needs, not to resolve ethical dilemmas or interpret legal documents such as living wills. Involving the dietitian may not be helpful in addressing the conflict between the client's wishes and the family's request.