A nurse is teaching a client who has a newly documented latex allergy. Which of the following statements by the client indicates an understanding of the teaching?

Choice A reason: Providing transportation information is helpful but does not directly coordinate care, as it addresses access rather than securing services. Coordination involves arranging specific care delivery, so this action is supportive but less comprehensive, making it incorrect for demonstrating care coordination.
Choice B reason: Encouraging self-advocacy empowers the client but does not actively coordinate care, which requires arranging services or resources. This action is educational, not logistical, and does not ensure access to health services, making it incorrect for this context.
Choice C reason: Informing about providers who accept insurance is informative but not sufficient for coordination, which involves facilitating actual care delivery. Without arranging services, this action remains preparatory, making it less effective than directly securing an appointment, thus incorrect.
Choice D reason: Arranging an appointment with a mobile health clinic directly facilitates access to care, addressing rural barriers. This active coordination ensures the client receives services, aligning with case management principles for underserved populations, making it the correct demonstration of care coordination.

Choice A reason: Using a mechanical lift for a 136 kg client unable to assist ensures safety for both client and nurse. Lifts prevent injury by supporting the client’s weight, reducing strain on staff. This adheres to safe patient handling guidelines, minimizing risks of falls or musculoskeletal injuries during transfer.
Choice B reason: Asking another nurse to assist is insufficient for a 136 kg client unable to help, as manual lifting risks injury to staff and client. Mechanical lifts are required for heavy or non-assistive clients to ensure safety, making this option inadequate and unsafe for the transfer scenario described.
Choice C reason: Positioning the client upright before transfer is impractical for a non-assistive client weighing 136 kg, as it requires significant manual effort and risks injury. Mechanical lifts are needed to safely move such clients, ensuring stability and preventing falls, making this action inappropriate for the transfer.
Choice D reason: A sliding board is unsuitable for a 136 kg client unable to assist, as it requires some patient cooperation and strength. It risks injury to staff and client due to the client’s weight and inability to participate. Mechanical lifts are the safer, recommended method for this transfer.