A nurse is reviewing the medication list of a patient with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who is receiving hemodialysis. The nurse knows that certain medications are used to prevent complications of this disease. Which of the following medications would the nurse question as part of routine therapy for preventing complications of ESRD?

Choice A reason: Increased potassium intake is dangerous in ESRD, as impaired kidneys cannot excrete potassium, leading to hyperkalemia. This can disrupt cardiac membrane potentials, causing arrhythmias or cardiac arrest. ESRD diets require strict potassium restriction to prevent life-threatening electrolyte imbalances, making this modification inappropriate.

Choice B reason: Increased protein intake is often recommended in ESRD patients on hemodialysis to replace protein lost during dialysis and prevent malnutrition. However, it must be balanced to avoid excess urea production, which can worsen uremia. This is not the primary focus compared to phosphorus management in this context.

Choice C reason: Decreased phosphorus intake is critical in ESRD, as kidneys cannot excrete phosphate, leading to hyperphosphatemia. This causes vascular calcification and secondary hyperparathyroidism, increasing cardiovascular risk. Dietary phosphorus restriction, often with phosphate binders, prevents these complications, making it a key dietary modification for hemodialysis patients.

Choice D reason: Decreased calcium intake is not recommended in ESRD, as patients often have hypocalcemia due to impaired vitamin D activation and phosphate retention. Calcium supplementation or adequate intake is needed to prevent bone disease and secondary hyperparathyroidism, making this modification incorrect for ESRD management.

Choice A reason: One-to-one observation for aggressive behavior is a standard safety measure to prevent harm, aligning with the right to safe care. It does not violate client rights when justified by clinical need, as it prioritizes protection without restricting autonomy unnecessarily, making it an appropriate intervention.

Choice B reason: Using physical restraints to prevent self-harm is permissible when less restrictive measures fail, aligning with the right to safety. If properly documented and justified, it does not violate rights, as mental health laws allow restraints for imminent danger, making this action compliant with client rights.

Choice C reason: Searching belongings at admission is standard in psychiatric settings to ensure safety (e.g., removing contraband). This practice, when conducted respectfully and per policy, does not violate client rights, as it prioritizes a safe therapeutic environment for all patients and staff on the unit.

Choice D reason: Lack of documentation of treatment benefits and options violates the right to informed consent. Clients must be informed about treatment rationale and alternatives to make autonomous decisions. Failure to document this breaches legal and ethical standards, undermining the client’s ability to participate in their care, making it a rights violation.